Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Iditarod Musher Dramatically Revives Fallen Dog [View all]jsmirman
(4,507 posts)107. Thank you for the article/I gotta tell you
Three deaths a race being presented as acceptable?
The idea that in that span of time, taking that (I would think) unusually healthy population of dogs, all in the prime of life - I call statistical BS that three from that population are likely to die under normal circumstances. I've done statistical work for a living, and there are all sorts of statistical shenanigans in the statement here:
Race veterinarians say those are the sorts of deaths that happen to dogs almost anywhere on a daily basis, although the motor vehicle most likely to hit and kill dogs elsewhere is a car or truck, not a snowmobile. Illnesses, however, kill dogs the same way they do people, only more often given the relatively short life spans of canines.
This is pure justification. I've got to think reading this description makes you at least the slightest bit uncomfortable - well cared for, healthy dogs do not just up and die at those rates over a period of less than two weeks.
It's this kind of junk from veterinarians for hire that makes me hate the AVMA and not trust someone solely on the basis of them having a DVM/VMD.
Citing short doggy lifespans to justify deaths in a two week period? Come on.
I'm going to have to go with needing to see a number of years of ZERO deaths, or death only under extraordinary/unpreventable circumstances, to not find the event unsettling. People die crossing the street, sure. People also die running super-marathons in the desert. Just because there's a chance you could die doing both doesn't make the two things equally deadly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
no one outside who hates it gets ir or ever saw it. They don't know about the dogs and
roguevalley
Mar 2012
#22
Have I ever seen it live? No. Have I followed it since Susan Butcher started dominating?
jsmirman
Mar 2012
#27
I have been gone for about five years, so I do not follow it as closely as I did.
Drahthaardogs
Mar 2012
#115
I've done a 180 on that race & I no longer think it's a good thing for the dogs.
xchrom
Mar 2012
#10
For some reason this was alerted on. I have no idea where else it would belong.
HopeHoops
Mar 2012
#14
Yeah, that's why I wouldn't have locked it even if I didn't like it. Good story though.
HopeHoops
Mar 2012
#18
Gee, maybe being committed to your dog means not making it run 1,000 miles.
Arugula Latte
Mar 2012
#16
you never saw it or are around these dogs. I can't tell you how different they are than ordinary
roguevalley
Mar 2012
#21
I know, Blue. I try anyway. :) They are so wonderful. Lucky you to go to Nome. Hugs, honey
roguevalley
Mar 2012
#119
and you don't know crap. Philly burbs. Come here and see for yourself. Oh wait. That would be
roguevalley
Mar 2012
#120
And people die of heart attacks after leaving the Dr.'s office and getting an EKG.
hobbit709
Mar 2012
#76