Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,151 posts)
5. Simple math
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 07:12 PM
Mar 2012

He has upset people who don't listen to him. Because his advertisers seek business from both those who listen to him and those that don't, they made the economically rational decision to bail on Rush (there are a lot more people who don't listen to rush than that do). But for the radio station that carries Rush, they have a lot of listeners who listen not only to rush, but to other programs on their stations and they don't want to run the risk of alienating the loyal rush listeners so that they abandon the station and its other programs. So they leave rush on, since even if he isn't drawing in ad bucks for his show, keeping him on keeps the ad revenue flowing to their other shows.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why isn't Rush gone by no...»Reply #5