During the Zimmerman trial, we have had DUers argue for his acquittal, which, of course, happened...

[bobclark86]

173. Under the laws clearly written by a dipshit gunfucker

No, he did not commit murder. So the jury had to acquit, as a jury nullification would have almost certainly led to an overturned verdict on appeal -- which would have dragged this shit out to the state supreme court, which would have flipped the verdict. We'd have similar results -- shithead out free, family unable to sue -- but add in a couple more million dollars in prosecution costs to be pulled from helping poor school districts or homeless people with hepatitis.

BTW, only a person with a severe mental disability -- that would be a retard (Sorry, Sarah Palin) -- thinks someone who starts a fight, finds out he's losing like a little bitch to a teen 50 pounds lighter and pulls a gun should get off scot-free. Oh, or somebody who goes hunting for black people.

As I said, clearly written by a dipshit gunfucker.