Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cold War-era 'Warthog' plane targeted for retirement amid budget cuts [View all]NeoGreen
(4,036 posts)39. I'm sorry...
...but I have to agree with Aristus that you came down a bit hard on a DU'er with only 29 posts.
I guess I saw missing "sarcasm" brackets on the Rah Rah elements of Tina Trons post.
And I did not see anything in the post that suggested that A-10's are effective only for tanks.
Maybe I'm wrong, but your response seemed harsh to me too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As a tanker, I have a certain affection and respect for the "tanker's friend", the Warthog.
Aristus
Nov 2013
#6
The Taliban would occasionally capture tanks from the Soviets during their war then.
Aristus
Nov 2013
#12
Wow, I didn't realize being in favor of retiring the A10 was tantamount to supporting the Taliban
NuclearDem
Nov 2013
#28
That and you need to knock out about half the aircraft before it feels uncomfortable
Posteritatis
Nov 2013
#54