Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:36 PM Nov 2013

Rolling Stone - On the 50th anniv of JFK's death, his nephew recalls the president's attempts [View all]

to halt the war machine





By Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
November 20, 2013 12:30 PM ET

On November 22nd, 1963, my uncle, president John F. Kennedy, went to Dallas intending to condemn as "nonsense" the right-wing notion that "peace is a sign of weakness." He meant to argue that the best way to demonstrate American strength was not by using destructive weapons and threats but by being a nation that "practices what it preaches about equal rights and social justice," striving toward peace instead of "aggressive ambitions." Despite the Cold War rhetoric of his campaign, JFK's greatest ambition as president was to break the militaristic ideology that has dominated our country since World War II. He told his close friend Ben Bradlee that he wanted the epitaph "He kept the peace," and said to another friend, William Walton, "I am almost a 'peace at any price' president." Hugh Sidey, a journalist and friend, wrote that the governing aspect of JFK's leadership was "a total revulsion" of war. Nevertheless, as James W. Douglass argues in his book JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters, JFK's presidency would be a continuous struggle with his own military and intelligence agencies, which engaged in incessant schemes to trap him into escalating the Cold War into a hot one. His first major confrontation with the Pentagon, the Bay of Pigs catastrophe, came only three months into his presidency and would set the course for the next 1,000 days.

JFK's predecessor, Dwight D. Eisenhower, had finalized support on March 17th, 1960, for a Cuban invasion by anti-Castro insurgents, but the wily general left its execution to the incoming Kennedy team. From the start, JFK recoiled at the caper's stench, as CIA Director Allen Dulles has acknowledged, demanding assurances from CIA and Pentagon brass that there was no chance of failure and that there would be no need for U.S. military involvement. Dulles and the generals knowingly lied and gave him those guarantees.

When the invasion failed, JFK refused to order airstrikes against Castro. Realizing he had been drawn into a trap, he told his top aides, David Powers and Kenneth O'Donnell, "They were sure I'd give in to them and send the go-ahead order to the [U.S. Navy aircraft carrier] Essex. They couldn't believe that a new president like me wouldn't panic and try to save his own face. Well, they had me figured all wrong." JFK was realizing that the CIA posed a monumental threat to American democracy. As the brigade faltered, he told Arthur Schlesinger that he wanted to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds."

The next confrontation with the defense and intelligence establishments had already begun as JFK resisted pressure from Eisenhower, the Joint Chiefs and the CIA to prop up the CIA's puppet government in Laos against the communist Pathet Lao guerrillas. The military wanted 140,000 ground troops, with some officials advocating for nuclear weapons. "If it hadn't been for Cuba," JFK told Schlesinger, "we might be about to intervene in Laos. I might have taken this advice seriously." JFK instead signed a neutrality agreement the following year and was joined by 13 nations, including the Soviet Union.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/john-f-kennedys-vision-of-peace-20131120#ixzz2lEBSIY8D




25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And we all know how the war machine responded to *that* villager Nov 2013 #1
+1 Scuba Nov 2013 #2
RFK Jr has articulated the strongest motive for the assassination Martin Eden Nov 2013 #15
I believe this was the motivation for the assassination. Enthusiast Nov 2013 #18
I'm convinced also: the move to peace in our time was going be stopped at any cost and it was. indepat Nov 2013 #20
+1 Vincardog Nov 2013 #21
They killed him RobertEarl Nov 2013 #3
+1000 LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #4
Who are "they"? YoungDemCA Nov 2013 #5
In the OP, young one, in the OP RobertEarl Nov 2013 #6
Their names are rarely in the headlines, they work in the shadows. I never, ever bought monmouth3 Nov 2013 #7
Very Few ever did buy into the Warren Report RobertEarl Nov 2013 #19
Do you think "they" are going to go on TV and raise their hands? Boomerproud Nov 2013 #10
K&R n/t Hotler Nov 2013 #8
K&r !! TheUnspeakable Nov 2013 #9
K & R !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #11
Much more than a president was killed that day. Martin Eden Nov 2013 #12
That's why it's so important for Americans to know what happened... polichick Nov 2013 #13
Our enemy is the Powers That Be, pulling strings behind the scenes. Martin Eden Nov 2013 #14
I know and you know - but everybody has to know... polichick Nov 2013 #16
+1 a whole bunch.......nt Enthusiast Nov 2013 #17
Stuff like this Dyedinthewoolliberal Nov 2013 #22
K&R woo me with science Nov 2013 #23
kick. Great article. Needs to be kicked at least once a week. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #24
Kicked Evvey Couple Of Minutes... WillyT Nov 2013 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rolling Stone - On the 50...