‘Rape porn’ possession to be punished by three years in jail, David Cameron to announce

[Warren DeMontague]

784. I'll do what I want, thanks.

If you don't want people to mention the absurd straw characters you constantly create and tilt against - you know, like the perverts in this thread who are up in arms that their "right to get off on the rape porn they obviously love so much might get taken away" - quite absolutely one of the most ridiculously absurd characterizations of a discussion I've ever seen, anywhere, period - then don't create them. Try arguing against the things people have actually said, instead of making stuff up and then putting those words in the mouths of the people you're mad at.

You're obviously going to continue to misrepresent the shit I say, no matter what I do. The pattern repeats itself, and it's a waste of time. There's no point. But bothering to argue with it and ignoring it without comment are not the same thing. No one in this thread is like "oh, yeah, rape is great, we can't have anyone outlawing films of actual rape"- what people have said, to deaf ears apparently, is that when a government tries to get in the business of outlawing consenting adults depicting something fictional, they're headed into murky legal territory.

And I haven't even weighed in on the law in question at all, in this thread.

In answer to your question upthread, though, you need to do your own research. The posts I referenced are there. You didn't make them.