Cold Case: JFK – NOVA program now online

[Spider Jerusalem]

129. No, it's not.

Most countries have a hundred-year rule for sensitive information. And the evidence of that website is in fact as authenticated. Unless you're going to argue that the film was faked, or that the forensics of the autopsy (which show a shot from behind, confirmed by the Clark panel review, confirmed by the HSCA forensic panel review, et cetera ad infinitum) were faked. The forward snap (first observed on close examination, again, in 1965) is a fact consistent with and supported by the forensic evidence showing a shot from behind and the ballistics evidence showing that bullet fragments recovered from the limo were fired from Oswald's rifle (and therefore from the TSBD, and therefore from behind). If there were any evidence whatever supporting a different shooter, a different weapon, or a frontal shot, then this could be said to be "unauthenticated"; in light of the evidence supporting it, calling it "unauthenticated" is frankly risible.