Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

djean111

(14,255 posts)

3. Well, darling, if some do not pay out of pocket because they have so little income,

Reply to Post removed (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 21, 2013, 06:57 AM

Nov 2013

then ALL taxpayers pay. Which, of course, is the objective, IMO - taxpayers will end up paying just as much to Pharma and the insurance companies as they would if we had single payer - without getting anything anywhere near the benefits.
Well done, Pharma and insurance and Wall Street!

ETA - thanks, jury - I hatessss getting so pissed off first thing in the morning. Excellent!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The TPP's potential impact on the ACA: [View all] cali Nov 2013 OP

Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #1

Well, darling, if some do not pay out of pocket because they have so little income, djean111 Nov 2013 #3

5 to 1 DrDan Nov 2013 #4

Yikes! k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #2

TPP is the Enabling Act for corporate rule. N/T fasttense Nov 2013 #5

Why would Obama's Trade Representative do such a counterproductive thing? Fumesucker Nov 2013 #6

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ n/t Heather MC Nov 2013 #7

worse & worse & worse. bunnies Nov 2013 #8

^ Wilms Nov 2013 #9