Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Are_grits_groceries

(17,139 posts)
15. Lester Munson, a lawyer who analyzes cases for ESPN, had this to say:
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 09:55 AM
Nov 2013

(I am paraphrasing)
The victim apparently went immediately to the hospital and had a rape kit performed. The clothers and other items were kept as is procedure.

What this case will probably hinge on is the medical report that is filed with it. In most rape cases, there is damage to the woman that is visible. This can be bruising or tears or both. If that was recorded, he is going to have a hard time.

It is not impossible that he would be found not guilty in a trial. They are crap shoots. There has apparently been so much police malfeasance in this case that a defense lawyer could make it seem as if everything was tainted. If he can change the trial from the DNA and medical report if it shows damage to that issue, who knows?

The question is what does the medical report show?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Test links Winston's DNA ...»Reply #15