Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)

6. Oh wow. Thank you for this. But the 1st sentence of the 3rd paragraph you posted is a bit

Reply to MinM (Reply #5)

Thu Nov 21, 2013, 11:16 AM

Nov 2013

over the top. It looked pretty convincing back then when I saw the report (aside: I knew Peter Jennings was sick with lung cancer and I watched more because of that because honestly, it was preaching to the choir regarding JFK's assassination…I *always* thought there was something else afoot *and* that there's a Bush connection. Really)

I remember feeling very unsatisfied, but maybe resigned that it could have happened that way.

I had no idea the connection of Gus Russo. None whatsoever. This is telling.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About JFK: Didn't Peter Jennings do a report showing the computer graphics of the convertible [View all] LaydeeBug Nov 2013 OP

Re: Single bullet theory econoclast Nov 2013 #1

I remember watching the Jennings doc and HATING it, but it was much more plausible than LaydeeBug Nov 2013 #2

Yes, the documentary supports the Warren Report. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #4

The Peter Jennings piece has been thoroughly debunked. MinM Nov 2013 #5

Oh wow. Thank you for this. But the 1st sentence of the 3rd paragraph you posted is a bit LaydeeBug Nov 2013 #6

I would say that's accurate. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #3