My take on JFK Conspiracy Theories and Theorists.

[DanTex]

4. Maybe. But then where are the non-nutjobs?

I picked up Jim DiEuginio's book, with moderate to high hopes, since he seems to be one of the more highly respected conspiracy authors. But I was disappointed to find that he also believes, among other things, that the JFK head jerk is evidence of a shot from the grassy knoll. He also seems to believe that all the evidence linking Oswald to the rifle was faked -- the fact that it was delivered to his PO box, that the order for the rifle was in his handwriting, that there are photos of him holding it, that his finger/palm prints were found both on the rifle and on the boxes from where the shots were fired, the fact that his wife testified that she saw it, etc.

I'm certainly not going to dig into 2 million documents myself to figure out what happened. Is it too much to ask that there be some credible author present the case for conspiracy without making simple logic errors?