Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Note! Senate leaders can discharge a committee from consideration of nominee [View all]Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)32. Here is another HUGE possible problem: 'blue slips'
IF both senators from a state do not turn in their 'blue slips' then the nominee will not get a 'hearing'.
And without a hearing a really doubt that the nominee would be brought to the floor.
Or is the blue slip phase after the hearing and before the committee vote?
I think it is 'before' they get a hearing.
Anyone know for sure?
Edited to add...
Article on link below regarding 'blue slips'
Senator Leahy and the Blue Slips
Here: http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/03/senator-leahy-and-blue-slips
Here: http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/03/senator-leahy-and-blue-slips
AND also...
-snip-
The rules change will not lead to an immediate flood of judges, however, as Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Judiciary Committee, observes what's known as the "blue slip rule," a tradition in the committee that allows senators to advance or block judicial nominees from their home state. Republicans are currently refusing to submit blue slips for four nominees pending in the committee, effectively stalling their entire confirmation process. And they could use that same rule to block others in committee.
The rules change has repercussions for what's known as the "hold," where a senator threatens to filibuster unless some related or unrelated demand is met. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), for instance, was holding Yellen's nomination while demanding an audit of the Federal Reserve.
With filibusters on nominees now easier to overcome, a hold has less power, though it can still slow down the process.
-snip-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/21/senate-filibuster_n_4319665.html
The rules change will not lead to an immediate flood of judges, however, as Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Judiciary Committee, observes what's known as the "blue slip rule," a tradition in the committee that allows senators to advance or block judicial nominees from their home state. Republicans are currently refusing to submit blue slips for four nominees pending in the committee, effectively stalling their entire confirmation process. And they could use that same rule to block others in committee.
The rules change has repercussions for what's known as the "hold," where a senator threatens to filibuster unless some related or unrelated demand is met. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), for instance, was holding Yellen's nomination while demanding an audit of the Federal Reserve.
With filibusters on nominees now easier to overcome, a hold has less power, though it can still slow down the process.
-snip-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/21/senate-filibuster_n_4319665.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Note! Senate leaders can discharge a committee from consideration of nominee [View all]
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
OP
Thanks. This is why GOP are so mad about rules change. They are screwn!!111
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
#8
Hold on a minute. A motion or resolution would have to have 60 votes for cloture right?
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#26
We'll see how it works out...but one would imagine any vote directly related to
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
#36
Well, the Senate Rethuglicans got what they wanted . . a kick to the lower extremities.
Major Hogwash
Nov 2013
#10
They will be confirmed swiftly since they are out of committee already!
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
#16
Great news. Now pack the courts with impartial judges. It's a last resort for justice.
freshwest
Nov 2013
#18
I wasn't sure if they would have to be 'nominated' again as if they'd been totally dropped.
freshwest
Nov 2013
#25
They had not been dropped. All three are out of committee waiting for a full senate vote.
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#29
I did. Republican intransigence for the past few years might have changed his mind
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
#37