Don Curtis, Parkland resident, on JFK assassination: "the posterior part of his head was blown out."

[Karmadillo]

116. So now you've moved from they're authenticated to it stands to reason that despite

the problems and suppressions and possibilities, those photos are just as good as authenticated. Quite a razor that always reaches your preordained conclusion. Just like your razor slashes all those many, many witnesses who saw a blow out in the back of JFK's head, from Clilnt Hill to Dr. McClelland, from Parkland to Bethesda into ribbons of insignificance. Awesomely convincing.

And the quote from McAdams does mislead a little on McClelland:

http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/what-did-dr-mcclelland-think-about-jfks-wounds/

<edit>

"In Part 3, Dr. McClelland talks about his thinking regarding the causes of the assassination. “I’m reasonably comfortable in my own mind that there was a conspiracy,” he says.

Politically, McClelland describes himself as a “middle of the roader.”

After the Dallas doctors declared Kennedy dead, his body was taken to Washington where doctors at Bethesda Naval Hospital conducted an autopsy and took photos of the president’s body.

McClelland recounts when he was shown the JFK autopsy photos in 1988. He agreed the photos showed the president’s wounds as he saw them on November 22, 1963. The only exception, said Dr. McClelland, was the photo that showed the right rear JFK’s head. He said that a flap of scalp had been pulled over Kennedy’s fatal wound changing the appearance of the wound.

“That’s where there was a massive hole in the back of his head,” McClelland said. “I looked at that hole from 18 inches for about 12 minutes.”

more...