General Discussion

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)

49. Sources are dead or very very old now.

Reply to TomClash (Reply #44)

Fri Nov 22, 2013, 07:42 AM

Nov 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My only post on the JFK assassination [View all] scheming daemons Nov 2013 OP

There is probably so much more in those files than who killed JFK. morningfog Nov 2013 #1

if you can think of reasons, present a plausible one scheming daemons Nov 2013 #3

Yeah, damage like learning that our own government killed our president. n/t GoneFishin Nov 2013 #8

LOL, like the government did 911? Logical Nov 2013 #35

Different topic. Nice bait attempt though. n/t GoneFishin Nov 2013 #60

That TPTB will not let the public know how 9-11 really played out speaks volumes imo indepat Nov 2013 #61

Are those reasons consistent with keeping Oswald's tax returns secret? Zen Democrat Nov 2013 #11

Well how about sharing a reason? You say you think of some. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #12

Agreed. There are probably CIA & FBI operational secrets in those files stopbush Nov 2013 #18

Here's the answer to your question: Th1onein Nov 2013 #21

Thanks for the link. But why be so selective in your quoting? stopbush Nov 2013 #26

I'm not being selective. And your quotes, including the bolded one, just proved my point. Th1onein Nov 2013 #27

The point is that everything is scheduled to be released in 2017, as the article points out. stopbush Nov 2013 #29

You believe everything that comes from "authority," don't you? Th1onein Nov 2013 #30

Why has it taken over 50 years for the National Archives and the government to prepare these JDPriestly Nov 2013 #40

Dick Cheney can de-classify current stuff HubertHeaver Nov 2013 #43

What reasons? Old and In the Way Nov 2013 #38

There are too many unanswered questions. Major Hogwash Nov 2013 #2

BAM! Slam Dunk! GoneFishin Nov 2013 #4

k/r excellent post. Release the files NOW solarhydrocan Nov 2013 #5

Thank you. No excuse is acceptable. ancianita Nov 2013 #6

Don't forget... Archae Nov 2013 #7

and whoever impersonated "Oswald" in the Mexico City phone call, presumably also acted alone. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #9

The impersonator is bottom right, without his 'stache Holly_Hobby Nov 2013 #62

Very logical post. defacto7 Nov 2013 #10

I agree. Release all of them. nyquil_man Nov 2013 #13

Perfect time to do it. Where do I sign up. ancianita Nov 2013 #14

I said this to someone the other day: nyquil_man Nov 2013 #20

I've called the Capitol many times. No problem. Let's do it. ancianita Nov 2013 #25

I'm thinking, I'm thinking. A-Schwarzenegger Nov 2013 #15

Yas! How interesting... JackRiddler Nov 2013 #16

Easy Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #17

If Oswald acted alone... Then none of those agents or nations were involved! scheming daemons Nov 2013 #19

There you go! Th1onein Nov 2013 #23

Agents, and informants Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #24

Seems like one black magic marker might take care of that. A-Schwarzenegger Nov 2013 #31

JFK Records Act says "released by 26 October 2017" Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #32

Sorry, don't understand what your post specifically refers to A-Schwarzenegger Nov 2013 #33

surely every agent is dead or retired by now scheming daemons Nov 2013 #46

"and informants" Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #52

if Oswald acted alone... what informants? scheming daemons Nov 2013 #54

The ones who would've told the US government that Cuba and the Soviet Union et al weren't involved? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #56

I remember hearing that the files wouldn't be opened until 100 years after the event. Kablooie Nov 2013 #22

It doesn't "threaten National Security".... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #28

They may simply be embarrassing. moondust Nov 2013 #34

embarrassment isnt "national security" scheming daemons Nov 2013 #51

LOL, because you cannot think of a reason means there are none? Classic! nt Logical Nov 2013 #36

Can you think of a reason? JDPriestly Nov 2013 #41

50 years after the fact... no reason is good enough now. scheming daemons Nov 2013 #47

I don't know who you're talking about... could it be? could it be...SATAN???!!! SaveAmerica Nov 2013 #37

Truth will out ucrdem Nov 2013 #39

Dulles has been dead for a while. scheming daemons Nov 2013 #48

K&R I strongly support your message. avaistheone1 Nov 2013 #42

Sources and methods TomClash Nov 2013 #44

Sources are dead or very very old now. scheming daemons Nov 2013 #49

You still protect them and their families TomClash Nov 2013 #58

You know who ~is~ alive still, eh? Fumesucker Nov 2013 #45

if there was no conspiracy, poppy isnt relevant scheming daemons Nov 2013 #50

Kicked and recommended. Enthusiast Nov 2013 #53

Totally agree Ichingcarpenter Nov 2013 #55

The flaw in this argument is the assumption that a conspiracy to kill JFK is the only DanTex Nov 2013 #57

This is a great point and the one thing that has always made me go hmmmm riderinthestorm Nov 2013 #59