Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
20. Three Charts Explain Why Democrats Went Nuclear on the Filibuster
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 10:43 AM
Nov 2013
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/11/charts-explain-why-democrats-went-nuclear-filibuster


Three Charts Explain Why Democrats Went Nuclear on the Filibuster
—By Kevin Drum and Jaeah Lee Nov. 22, 2013

No one has completely clean hands when it comes to filibusters in the Senate. Democrats have used them and Republicans have used them. But hoo boy, Republicans sure have used them more. That's why Democrats went nuclear on Thursday. Three charts tell the story.

The first two charts show the evolution of filibusters by presidential administration. As you can see, their use rose steadily through the 80s and then leveled off starting around 1990. Democrats mainly kept things pretty stable throughout the Bush administration, increasing the number of filibusters only in his last two years when a change of power seemed imminent. When Obama took over, however, there was no honeymoon, not even for a minute. Republicans went into full-bore filibuster mode the day he took office, and they've kept it up ever since. For all practical purposes, anything more controversial than renaming a post office has required 60 votes during the entire Obama presidency...........


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I knew it was bad, brer cat Nov 2013 #1
Three Charts Explain Why Democrats Went Nuclear on the Filibuster Coyotl Nov 2013 #20
More Blue Links? MineralMan Nov 2013 #2
+1,000 malaise Nov 2013 #10
Dems. should bring up the same names again in the Senate, wherever Cal33 Nov 2013 #3
Holy smokes. HappyMe Nov 2013 #4
Just look at those#'s! sheshe2 Nov 2013 #5
Sedition poorly disguised as obstruction and equal to a crime against the Constitution these indepat Nov 2013 #6
I can see the Faux Noise talking point already.... Wounded Bear Nov 2013 #7
168 bigbadR Nov 2013 #15
Huh? Wounded Bear Nov 2013 #16
No, their talking point will be NewJeffCT Nov 2013 #27
Yep, but corporate media won't print that! Iliyah Nov 2013 #8
I'm happy Reid went "nuclear" and eliminated the filibuster against executive appointment rule. Uncle Joe Nov 2013 #9
this is beyond politics....call it what you want. spanone Nov 2013 #11
What makes Obama different from the other Presidents there? Cali_Democrat Nov 2013 #12
hmmm...I'm totally stumped myself hibbing Nov 2013 #25
wow! this is incredible Hutzpa Nov 2013 #13
Needs to be on the front page...nt. msanthrope Nov 2013 #14
Thanks for bringing the facts TBF Nov 2013 #17
Thanks ProSense.. excellent information in a nice Cha Nov 2013 #18
Boink. Scurrilous Nov 2013 #19
Yet I keep hearing/reading ..but Democrats do the same thing =p athenasatanjesus Nov 2013 #21
k&r for the truth. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #22
Anyone know the breakdown of the other 86 nominee filibusters? ARMYofONE Nov 2013 #23
We just took over the Judiciary in one fell swoop, and they didn't see it coming. msanthrope Nov 2013 #24
Incredible. And shameful. /nt Marr Nov 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»168 filibusters of nomine...»Reply #20