A short post for the conspiracy naysayers.

[The Midway Rebel]

31. Respectfully doc, I am not sure what JFK threads you have been reading

but the the vituperation works both ways. You post is full of it in fact.

You label us as naysayers when in fact many of us have open minds that have not been convinced by the evidence of a conspiracy, so far.

You claim you do not hate and that you are not angry, which suggests that everyone who disagrees with you is. Can you detect the moral superiority you claim here? I can.

You claim we have certainty when you have no real idea of our thought processes. Many of the so called "naysayers" started out as CTers, but changed positions in light of the best evidence. That is the hallmark of a flexible mind; a willingness to change opinions in light of new facts.

I suggest you follow some of these threads as objectively as possible and watch to see which side throws the first ad hominem argument into the discussion. Read the threads and watch how people share their ignorance about the topic. I admit I am bias but it seems to me CT "naysayers" are by far the best informed about the facts of the case and they do not multiply entities needlessly.

People willing to deny the hard science and nearly irrefutable forensic evidence open themselves up for mockery much the same as intelligent design proponents. Are you suggesting we should we keep the kid gloves on for them?

You called the Warren Report "Gospel" and you mention "Official Version 1.0." Sorry, but I cannot help but see those comments as derision of my opinions.

In the case of Ruby, you have apparently not listened to the arguments or the evidence that suggests he was mentally unstable and you are clinging to one single factoid to make your judgement about the entirety of the assassination while mocking those with "certainty" on the matter. That is bordering on hypocrisy IMHO.

I love you doc, you do wonderful things, this post ain't one them however.