General Discussion

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)

58. Hold Scalia Accountable

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 02:28 AM

Mar 2012

Hold Scalia Accountable for his remarks. We can't allow the media to let this go. He's was an incredible liar. If Gore were there during 9/11 I can't imagine how much better he would have handled it. However it would have to have been better than the lies the Bush Adm. told us ... and still no one has been indicted. So we can never forget what went down in Florida ever.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

106 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Grrrrrrrrrr: Scalia Rewrites History - Claims 5-4 Bush v Gore Decision - �Wasn�t Even Close' [View all] kpete Mar 2012 OP

K&R Solly Mack Mar 2012 #1

Speaking of P-resident wonder what he is doing these days Giantsfootball10 Mar 2012 #93

The last I heard, he was sucking at whatever he's doing. n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #94

He's not where he should be (if there was any actual justice in America). Solly Mack Mar 2012 #96

He sold the place in Crawford ASAP. harmonicon Mar 2012 #105

how nice, the students invites him to their school and he lies to them Enrique Mar 2012 #2

Hey, Scalia! Vaffanculo! sakabatou Mar 2012 #3

And you thought billybob537 Mar 2012 #4

The name " Bush v Gore " tells us Bush filed the case. How stupid does he think we are? nt Vincardog Mar 2012 #5

Exactly. Canuckistanian Mar 2012 #25

Impeach him for Lying. bahrbearian Mar 2012 #30

I believe he was saying Gore was the first to the judicial branch jeff47 Mar 2012 #34

Yes, jeff47. JDPriestly Mar 2012 #62

The very first legal filing in a Florida court was filed by the Republicans Samantha Mar 2012 #66

I was going to point that out, as well. Fawke Em Mar 2012 #73

Gore followed Florida state law, which is where this case should have remained, Bush took it to Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #6

You got it. CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #10

The logic was FL going to Gore would cause irreparable harm to the Bush presidency jeff47 Mar 2012 #35

It's tragic that they never considered irreparable harm to Gore or the people Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #86

Scalia is a deluded sack of fecal material or just a lying sack of shit? AlbertCat Mar 2012 #21

He is a Supreme Court Justice CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #37

So? Zoeisright Mar 2012 #51

So was Taney, he ruled that slaves were property Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #87

He's a criminal. He helped steal an election so I guess like all criminals, he does not want people sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #28

Hmm, I didn't know that. Did FL have selective recounting? joshcryer Mar 2012 #36

As I said Gore followed Florida State Law, which allowed counting or recounting only in areas Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #85

The decision on the recount dispute was 7-2. The remedy was 5-4. former9thward Mar 2012 #7

It's just so funny, because as a result, our nation suffered, and as many as a million people died! Gregorian Mar 2012 #8

This should be the number one story in America malaise Mar 2012 #9

But according to the media, Limbaugh's lies are more fun alp227 Mar 2012 #57

Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #11

no true judge would say, "Get over it" in reference to a controversial decison Skittles Mar 2012 #12

and he said it to a room full students ThomThom Mar 2012 #67

Hey Scalia! MrMickeysMom Mar 2012 #13

P.S... MrMickeysMom Mar 2012 #15

P.P.S. : Figlio da putana!!! Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2012 #56

How can these so called Christians Iliyah Mar 2012 #14

The problem is that there are no real consequences for him. LiberalFighter Mar 2012 #29

It's kind of ironic because the wife of the attorney which won the case in Bush vs Gore died on 9/11 Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #88

Here is Scalia's defination of "Wasn't even Close" on Bush v Gore.... LynneSin Mar 2012 #16

Any judge who's ability sulphurdunn Mar 2012 #17

Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #18

Here's an article on the back stage dealings during Bush v. Gore LastLiberal in PalmSprings Mar 2012 #19

Scalia spoke at my law school in 2004...same response MrCoffee Mar 2012 #20

He's spoken at a number of schools. xmas74 Mar 2012 #74

I think the wrong question is being asked. newspeak Mar 2012 #100

Let's just assume it WAS 7-2. Hell, let's assume it was 9-0. FedUp_Queer Mar 2012 #22

Had it gone to Congress, the results would have been the same nvme Mar 2012 #23

It doesn't matter, the point is the SC does not get to decide elections regardless. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #32

Exactly. Stopping the vote while Bush was ahead is the worst decision Zoeisright Mar 2012 #50

I gotta go with Citizens United as the worst decision since tclambert Mar 2012 #78

Oddly. FedUp_Queer Mar 2012 #91

Or Santa Clara County vs Southern Pacific Railroad nxylas Mar 2012 #99

You are dead on GD right. FedUp_Queer Mar 2012 #90

Good post, thank you. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #104

+1000 Canuckistanian Mar 2012 #26

Nino The Fixer The Wizard Mar 2012 #24

What an ass clown Scalia is / jimlup Mar 2012 #27

He's counting on the American people having the attention spans of guppies. Crunchy Frog Mar 2012 #31

I don't agree, but it was 7-2 backtomn Mar 2012 #33

That's wrong; 7-2 did not stop the recount BeyondGeography Mar 2012 #81

I can say this because wishing has no practical effect. Deep13 Mar 2012 #38

Funny davidpdx Mar 2012 #60

Vafanculo, Nino. n/t beac Mar 2012 #39

Seven Justices of the Court agree that there are constitutional problems with Fla_Democrat Mar 2012 #40

And let's never forget that one of the direct beneficiaries of Scalia's decision Art_from_Ark Mar 2012 #41

Comrade Scalia is correct JHB Mar 2012 #42

He said the same thing in 2009 on 60 Minutes hfojvt Mar 2012 #43

Quack Quack Scalia has been repeatedly reciting this same bullshit for over a decade now. Lasher Mar 2012 #64

The name of the case "Bush vs Gore" means Bush filed the lawsuit and is the plaintiff Gman Mar 2012 #44

Gore filed the original suit in Florida state courts. former9thward Mar 2012 #70

I stand technically corrected Gman Mar 2012 #84

Someone should tell Scalia: Roe vs. Wade was also "a long time ago," and it was also 7-2. BzaDem Mar 2012 #45

Still trying to cheat there is he. Well we know the truth. His lies are not going to change a lonestarnot Mar 2012 #46

Oh Scalia... if you were not a Supreme Court Justice and said that to me fascisthunter Mar 2012 #47

Lol, you mean he can't count votes either? caseymoz Mar 2012 #48

Fuck you, Fat Tony Zoeisright Mar 2012 #49

+1. RiffRandell Mar 2012 #98

Vast majority of Nation believes... davidthegnome Mar 2012 #52

Wouldn't it be carmic, if President Obama got to replace Scalia in the next several years! madinmaryland Mar 2012 #53

5-4 or 7 -2 doesn't change one thing PatrynXX Mar 2012 #54

This is the second time this fucking windbag has told me to "get over it." Never. Ever. nt Stardust Mar 2012 #55

An awful lot of people really want us to 'get over' that crime. I guess just when he sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #63

I'm still trying to wake up from this nightmare they caused. Stardust Mar 2012 #92

Hold Scalia Accountable YOHABLO Mar 2012 #58

If Gore had been President disndat Mar 2012 #71

Nader made it possible. It wasn't just Florida. Gore wouldn't have needed Florida if he had won libinnyandia Mar 2012 #82

Didn't Nader admitted to disndat Mar 2012 #102

I agree. I wish the Nader apologists could name one positive thing that occurred because of libinnyandia Mar 2012 #103

Every day I hope that SOB will drop dead davidpdx Mar 2012 #59

He really is a miserable waste of skin NICO9000 Mar 2012 #61

7 to 2 said Florida supreme court decides final ruling, 5 to 4 said they would not let that happen graham4anything Mar 2012 #65

AND many states didn't file their results by the deadline anyway underpants Mar 2012 #77

Scalia is old. He won't have the last word on anything abelenkpe Mar 2012 #68

Were his pants on fire at the time that he stated this? RoccoR5955 Mar 2012 #69

I guess it is OK to lie if you are a Supreme? nt MADem Mar 2012 #72

Scalia, the Scoundrel, is the leader of the cadre of the five most dangerous men in the nation. olegramps Mar 2012 #75

Justice John Paul Stevens NAILED IT with his dissent in Bush v Gore: bvar22 Mar 2012 #76

Scalia has now proved he can't do math OR the law. McCamy Taylor Mar 2012 #79

Don't worry fuckface, you will be remembered Rex Mar 2012 #80

WTF!!!!! Initech Mar 2012 #83

Term limits for judges are Madmiddle Mar 2012 #89

The case the should have heard was the violation of federal election law. VPStoltz Mar 2012 #95

Scalia and the other 4 never signed their opinion Art_from_Ark Mar 2012 #97

well, because of their decision newspeak Mar 2012 #101

Lyin' sack Blue Owl Mar 2012 #106