General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Liberals and violent porn and rape simulation [View all]ancianita
(43,313 posts)genitally mutilate girls because it's a tradition that "bigger than all of us", or "culture"? Do the kids and mutilated women know what they're consenting to? Might they "consent" to these things to survive? All of that is putatively no one's business, right?
What's fictional porn but the public reinforcement of private desires to reenact the 'art' of dominating, whether it's men on men, parents on children or grown women seeming or not seeming to show consent. So let's just keep elevating, reinforcing that domination and submission urge. Display its roots in the private realm. All of it. Don't draw any lines. Make and spend.
Crazy? Do dominator producers know the human rights issues and not care? Are they really well regulated human rights advocates of equality and freedom? Do they welcome well regulated industry that creates space for consent?
Only when the mechanism of manipulating consent is kept behind closed doors or is publicly sold as video, does this abuse of consent run rampant in both private and public spheres. Laws regulate or create a space for consent, but they don't necessarily or easily micromanage the consent sphere.
But then, who does the legal work or the regulating, right?