Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
16. Basically marriage is about contracts and legal rights. Its hard enough with serial monogamy
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 01:16 PM
Nov 2013

to sort out who gets what legally when its just between two parties at a time.

When you factor in multiple partners it would entangle the courts for many, many more years to sort through the contracts and legal obligations especially when it comes to children. If all of the adults are the legal parents of the children for example, how do you "split" the child custody equally between a man and 4 wives?

Polygamy made sense when the wife/wives and children were the man's property. Now we'd have messy child custody battles when infertile wife #1 wants custody sharing with wives #2, 3 and 4's children along with the husband.

If polygamy advocates could work out a way that was fair to everyone then fine but since virtually all polygamy is really about enforcing patriarchy, there's no way women would fair equally under the law in this system.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'll go you one further...who gives a shit? renie408 Nov 2013 #1
+1 Joel thakkar Nov 2013 #3
One argument is that where polygamy exists it exists in patriarchal societies where the women el_bryanto Nov 2013 #10
It's Friday. renie408 Nov 2013 #13
I'm sorry you must not be used to people disagreeing with you el_bryanto Nov 2013 #17
Yep, you nailed it. I am completely unused to people disagreeing with me. renie408 Nov 2013 #21
At the time you posted that, it was 2:06 am on Saturday in Japan. ieoeja Nov 2013 #23
They can do it now seveneyes Nov 2013 #11
And marriage is for a man and a woman?? renie408 Nov 2013 #14
Two people of any gender seveneyes Nov 2013 #20
I think it was the 'snare and bass' reference. renie408 Nov 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Trillo Nov 2013 #2
Don't you suppose this could be projection of being rejected/abandoned HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #4
If there were an organized group working to make polygamy and polyamorous marriages legal, morningfog Nov 2013 #5
Aaannnddd...that's where you lose me... renie408 Nov 2013 #7
Lol. It's all good. Everyone has a line, I suppose. morningfog Nov 2013 #8
There are excellent evolutionary reasons for strongly discouraging incest. Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #12
I tell them to gather others like themseves who want Polygamy to be legal JoePhilly Nov 2013 #6
The number of children born into polygamy increases exponentially, I would think. Skidmore Nov 2013 #9
I don't really care about polygamy LittleBlue Nov 2013 #15
Basically marriage is about contracts and legal rights. Its hard enough with serial monogamy riderinthestorm Nov 2013 #16
To me, traditional marriage implies... LanternWaste Nov 2013 #18
Rape porn Capt. Obvious Nov 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Polygamy is usually the h...»Reply #16