General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A short post for the conspiracy naysayers. [View all]stopbush
(24,801 posts)There is no evidence for your CT.
That's it.
Were you advocating that the earth was 6,000 years old, you'd get the same reaction from those of us living in a fact-based universe. There's no point debating the age of the earth with a person who is willfully ignorant of the evidence, so why debate a person who hasn't a clue as to the mountains of evidence in the JFK case?
To listen to the typical JFK CTist to hear the same tired lies about the murder over and over again. It's clear that most CTists get their info from Oliver Stone's movie, not from the actual evidence in the case.
Rather than CTists like yourself getting pissed off at those of us to whom evidence means something, you might direct your spleen at the CT authors et al who have been lying to you for the past 50 years.