Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Insurers to pay doctors 30-40% less under exchange plans. [View all]cyberswede
(26,117 posts)102. It was my understanding...

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
190 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The market will always say that sick people should be executed for not having money
eridani
Nov 2013
#12
What's your solution for that? Make it easier and cheaper to BECOME a doctor?
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2013
#5
Having recently experienced health care in France for a broken leg and the upon my return to the
Thinkingabout
Nov 2013
#126
I think you are right and I did not experience long waiting lines or months for health care.
Thinkingabout
Nov 2013
#170
You pay 1 day of your wages to visit a doctor, true. How much of that does the doctor keep?
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#53
I wrote ins pays 1/2, write off the rest. If you pay cash, typically there is a 10% discount, and
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#71
My PCP clears around 50K a year for 4 days a week. That is "still a lot"?
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#123
Just because a clinic's hours may be 9-5 does not mean that is the hours worked.
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#128
My PCP told me how much he makes a year. Not to the dollar but in the range. Try it, you might be
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#95
Doctors should be able to make good money because their expenses are pretty high
OwnedByCats
Nov 2013
#118
Honestly, blame part of the on the very reimbursements this thread is discussing
joeglow3
Nov 2013
#66
You do know medical schools limit enrollment for the reason they could make outrageous pay.
duffyduff
Nov 2013
#173
So, he makes too much? Are you proposing some kind of law limiting doctor pay? n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2013
#180
so go to medical school, become a doctor and you too can own those things...nt
magical thyme
Nov 2013
#134
You admit you do not know what doctor's income is, yet assume. A jeep means they are filthy rich, or
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#51
So you want him to pay the same amount, get a loan for the same amount, but an older house?
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#72
My beef with ACA has always been that it was insurance instead of health care.
hobbit709
Nov 2013
#3
And the number of patients they are being expected to see is actually increasing.
Adsos Letter
Nov 2013
#65
I know. That's why it's ludicrous for people to claim they're in collusion w/insurance companies
magical thyme
Nov 2013
#133
Might be good, but even under Medicare, insurance companies do most of administrative work.
Hoyt
Nov 2013
#27
I know, insurance companies do most of admin work. Plus, drug coverage is through insurance
Hoyt
Nov 2013
#39
Apparently you missed the point. But, see how quickly you get an appendectomy without insurance
Hoyt
Nov 2013
#166
Two simple questions. How do they know it is an exchange policy? & Since they arent in force
stevenleser
Nov 2013
#19
What do you mean "aren't being accepted"? That is present tense. That is not possible.
stevenleser
Nov 2013
#26
Insurance companies contract with physicians. Apparently some -- maybe a lot -- are not accepting
Hoyt
Nov 2013
#28
I would imagine it means the hospitals have reviewed the fed regs and policies
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2013
#29
I reached out to UCLA medical center and Cedar Sinai to see what they have to say.
stevenleser
Nov 2013
#34
I can already tell you that Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield are not covered by them
flamingdem
Nov 2013
#41
I look forward to reading what they have to say. Perhaps an OP would be in order.
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2013
#43
The contracting logically would have to be in place before the plans go effective.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2013
#35
Already in progress. Increase nurse practitioners and make them a less valuable commodity
TheKentuckian
Nov 2013
#54
Insurers don't contract by group number/type, they contract by type of policy - HMO, PPO, etc.
cbdo2007
Nov 2013
#49
That seems to be the case judging from my first response from UCLA. See above nt
stevenleser
Nov 2013
#146
Instead of "Medicare for all", ACA is more like "Means-tested Medicaid for all".
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#33
Does anyone need more proof insurance companies are bloodsucking assholes? The thread title sums
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#62
Too many "if's" in this story coming from the right wing propaganda machine
Lifelong Dem
Nov 2013
#63
You said you called the doctors and hospitals and asked them if they "took ACA"....
cbdo2007
Nov 2013
#106
Which is why I hid behind the door when that talent was offered. What can I say?
freshwest
Nov 2013
#144
Health care has gotten a lot more complicated, the more is known, the more technology there is
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#130
So we basically want to ensure that NO ONE goes into medicine then. Good plan. nt
Demo_Chris
Nov 2013
#119
Please explain how Medicare For All will PASS??? Your entire post is a moot point.
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#137
OK, but we needed something nationally NOW, and MANY states will never pass Medicare For All.
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#148
PLease inform me if I am wrong, but doctor/hospitals choose which insrurane plans
Incitatus
Nov 2013
#143
Well, that sounds like an attempt by insurance companies to sabotage healthcare
kestrel91316
Nov 2013
#162
With improved medicare for all, there's still a shortage of doctors, and they'll still be paid less
bhikkhu
Nov 2013
#175
How about the middle men, or the hospitals that charge 8 dollars for an aspirin. Where do the
lostincalifornia
Nov 2013
#176