General Discussion

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)

22. "Some of yous is ridiculous," LOL!

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 05:43 AM

Mar 2012

Right back at 'im! +1000

I haven't seen the referenced clip, so I don't know whether the claim that she is "humiliating, shaming, and patronizing" someone in it "in a mocking, non-compassionate way" is accurate or not--although 'non-compassionate' is a term that I would never even think of associating with RM.

What seems bonheaded is this back-assed way of making a point--which still is only partly clear, even after the exposition in the thread.

Instead of a straightforward discussion of the issue, the OP seems more interested in slamming fellow/sister members for their views in a flamebaiting way.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why has no one called out Rachel Maddow for her misandry? [View all] WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 OP

I had to look up "misandristic." Suich Mar 2012 #1

Well, you're wrong. It was misandristic. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #2

Off topic but heres a good addon for firefox madokie Mar 2012 #37

Which one are you talking about? The one from last October? csziggy Mar 2012 #3

No, it was less educational and more patronizing than you wish to admit too. She did it to... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #6

It was more educational than what most men bother to learn about women's reproduction csziggy Mar 2012 #48

She had some fun poking stupidity with a stick. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #4

Maher, misogynistic? Pfft. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #7

Maher occasionally makes sexist remarks, but he's no misogynist. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #10

No, I'm thinking that all of the threads about liberal misogynists are out of control WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #11

If Rachel spent 10 minutes 'humiliating, shaming, and patronizing' (AKA: mocking) AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #12

Is that what you've learned along the way? Stoop to their level? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #13

What a pantload. EFerrari Mar 2012 #15

How is Rachel different than Bill Maher or other liberals who've crawled up your butts? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #18

Lmao. EFerrari Mar 2012 #49

"Some of yous is ridiculous," LOL! pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #22

I know! None of you want to look! The horror!! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #23

"None of you want to look!" pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #25

YES!!! It is about you! It's all about you! If you *tried*, you would have figured that out long ago WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #27

You ought to consider getting back on your meds :) pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #31

I gave you too much credit, then WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #34

+1 sarcasmo Mar 2012 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #16

It's their crap Shankapotomus Mar 2012 #21

If Republican men have any self-awareness (doubtful), then ... tledford Mar 2012 #41

I don't think she really did that, though treestar Mar 2012 #56

She tells it like it is. If you don't like it. Get out of the kitchen. appleannie1 Mar 2012 #5

If you can't follow along, get out of the kitchen. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #9

LOL nicely done. k&r. nt TeamsterDem Mar 2012 #8

You couldn't even get 2 DUers to agree that Sharon Osborne was being sexist Zalatix Mar 2012 #14

You can't follow the discussion because you choose not to try. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #19

You can't follow what I SAID because you choose not to read. Zalatix Mar 2012 #38

I suspect they left that to you, and you're managing quite nicely. MADem Mar 2012 #17

This is low hanging fruit WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #20

Oh, I think it's already fallen off the tree at this point. nt MADem Mar 2012 #39

He is just mad cause no one would poo poo on Maher Rex Mar 2012 #52

I confess! Like *you*, I love it when Rachel demeans Republican men, too!! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #24

Maybe because we are secure in our manhood. Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #26

I don't know what accounts for all the knee-jerking 'round here WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #28

False Equivalency is always problematic Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #29

For many, equating Maher to Limbaugh came very easy WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #33

Because 99% of US population Dokkie Mar 2012 #30

I think everyone is fucking nuts 2pooped2pop Mar 2012 #32

I'm buying WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #35

I agree with you liberal_mama Mar 2012 #42

It's not so bad to own up to it 2pooped2pop Mar 2012 #47

Exactly. pa28 Mar 2012 #53

My shift is about up, and by the time I rise this thread will have been vaporized by Team Maddow WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #36

There is a difference between belittling a perception, and belittling a person. haele Mar 2012 #43

I'm in my "man cave" right now. Actually it's just the computer room, however... HopeHoops Mar 2012 #44

Trolling FAIL. Odin2005 Mar 2012 #45

He tried to poo poo Maher Rex Mar 2012 #51

...you'd have to morally dumb not to see the difference fascisthunter Mar 2012 #46

Wow, people cannot handle Gush being called out Rex Mar 2012 #50

So true Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #58

Wait...what? NoNeed4Attention Mar 2012 #54

Because most men aren't so overly sensitive that they see 'evil intentions' behind every joke. DutchLiberal Mar 2012 #55

This has to be satire. Quantess Mar 2012 #57