Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hibbing

(10,596 posts)

25. hmmm...I'm totally stumped myself

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Reply #12)

Sat Nov 23, 2013, 02:40 AM

Nov 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

168 filibusters of nominees in our history. HALF of them have occurred during Obama years! [View all] ProSense Nov 2013 OP

I knew it was bad, brer cat Nov 2013 #1

Three Charts Explain Why Democrats Went Nuclear on the Filibuster Coyotl Nov 2013 #20

More Blue Links? MineralMan Nov 2013 #2

+1,000 malaise Nov 2013 #10

Dems. should bring up the same names again in the Senate, wherever Cal33 Nov 2013 #3

Holy smokes. HappyMe Nov 2013 #4

Just look at those#'s! sheshe2 Nov 2013 #5

Sedition poorly disguised as obstruction and equal to a crime against the Constitution these indepat Nov 2013 #6

I can see the Faux Noise talking point already.... Wounded Bear Nov 2013 #7

168 bigbadR Nov 2013 #15

Huh? Wounded Bear Nov 2013 #16

No, their talking point will be NewJeffCT Nov 2013 #27

Yep, but corporate media won't print that! Iliyah Nov 2013 #8

I'm happy Reid went "nuclear" and eliminated the filibuster against executive appointment rule. Uncle Joe Nov 2013 #9

this is beyond politics....call it what you want. spanone Nov 2013 #11

What makes Obama different from the other Presidents there? Cali_Democrat Nov 2013 #12

hmmm...I'm totally stumped myself hibbing Nov 2013 #25

wow! this is incredible Hutzpa Nov 2013 #13

Needs to be on the front page...nt. msanthrope Nov 2013 #14

Thanks for bringing the facts TBF Nov 2013 #17

Thanks ProSense.. excellent information in a nice Cha Nov 2013 #18

Boink. Scurrilous Nov 2013 #19

Yet I keep hearing/reading ..but Democrats do the same thing =p athenasatanjesus Nov 2013 #21

k&r for the truth. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #22

Anyone know the breakdown of the other 86 nominee filibusters? ARMYofONE Nov 2013 #23

We just took over the Judiciary in one fell swoop, and they didn't see it coming. msanthrope Nov 2013 #24

Incredible. And shameful. /nt Marr Nov 2013 #26

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»168 filibusters of nomine...»Reply #25