General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should we really give the whole country a pass on reason when it comes to JFK conspiracies? [View all]wercal
(1,370 posts)Automatically eliminate the possibility of a larger conspiracy, does it?
My questions always revolve around Jack Ruby. In fact, one really has to suspend disbelief to dismiss him as irrelevant. In other words the real conspiracy theorists are the ones who simply erase his existence fron history.
Ruby, like Oswald, had ties to Cuba. Ruby impersonated a reporter at a post assassination press conference, and had the audacity to correct the speaker on the name of Oswald's Cuba organization. Ruby wanted to speak to the Warren Commission, on the condition he be moved to a new prison - they wouldn't agree to his condition.
Fingerprints are a diversion, as are any bullet or knoll theories. They don't matter one bit. No conspiracy theory or red herring fingerprint argument can erase the very real fact that the most famous assassin in the twentieth century was exterminated by a mystery man, with very few questions asked.
Of course there were more people than just Oswald involved...just like more than 19 people planned 9-11. It would be a whacko conspiracy theory to assume otherwise.