Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(8,240 posts)

15. Thanks. I didn't know that and it's a relief to know they can't just refuse to vote someone out of

Sat Nov 23, 2013, 01:55 PM

Nov 2013

committee. Otherwise they certainly would.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TPM: Why the Filibuster Change is Fantastic News for Obama. [View all] backscatter712 Nov 2013 OP

It is a big deal. k&r n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #1

Its a big fucking deal demwing Nov 2013 #8

thanks backscatter Cha Nov 2013 #2

kick kentuck Nov 2013 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author loudsue Nov 2013 #4

This should have happened in the midst of the ACA negotiations DJ13 Nov 2013 #5

This vote, you're right DJ13 Nov 2013 #12

That delays the vote about 2 days. jeff47 Nov 2013 #7

One thing is still in place: 'Blue Slips' Tx4obama Nov 2013 #10

Sorta jeff47 Nov 2013 #11

In 2011 the Senate ended the practice of secret holds (vote 92-4) Tx4obama Nov 2013 #13

IIRC, Reid can discharge the nominations from the Committee, backscatter712 Nov 2013 #14