General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary in Bosnia: lone gunman? [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)They've prepared a lot of smear stuff--nasty videos, mostly mocking stuff--in hopes that she will change her mind. A lot of it has been crafted after she won that senate seat. I won't link to it, it's garbage. It's up on YT if you have a strong stomach.
I don't have a problem at ALL with EW believing what she was told. Hell, to hear my relatives talk, we're all descended from KINGS, I tell you, KINGS!
I do have a problem with people who pretend this wasn't an issue, that there wasn't a "documentation" problem with her heritage claim, who don't understand that EW did have a tough time getting past it (some of the pundits were "sure" it would sink her candidacy) and who fail to note that EW, quite sensibly, has dropped any NA claims and doesn't list that heritage in the Senate roster.
And, like you, I find it funny how some people can play a deniability card with one candidate, and then grind on, incessantly, about others--HRC and POTUS, most particularly, and then expect me to believe that this kind of shit is coming from a place where the motivation is to "make the party stronger." Yeah, right--calling the Obama administration a "flaming pile of manure" is a "positive" post? With friends like that, who needs enemies?
I was born at night, but not last night...and I spent years on a farm, so I'm familiar with the smell of bullshit.