Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 06:47 PM Nov 2013

Uh Oh! It's Nader: "21 Ways Why Canada's Health Care is Better."--Any DU Canadians Care to Discuss? [View all]

Dear America:

Costly complexity is baked into Obamacare. No health insurance system is without problems but Canadian style single-payer full Medicare for all is simple, affordable, comprehensive and universal.

In the early 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson enrolled 20 million elderly Americans into Medicare in six months. There were no websites. They did it with index cards!

Below please find 21 Ways the Canadian Health Care System is Better than Obamacare.

Repeal Obamacare and replace it with the much more efficient single-payer, everybody in, nobody out, free choice of doctor and hospital.

Love, Canada


------------------------

Number 21:
In Canada, everyone is covered automatically at birth – everybody in, nobody out.

In the United States, under Obamacare, 31 million Americans will still be uninsured by 2023 and millions more will remain underinsured.

Number 20:
In Canada, the health system is designed to put people, not profits, first.

In the United States, Obamacare will do little to curb insurance industry profits and will actually enhance insurance industry profits.

Number 19:
In Canada, coverage is not tied to a job or dependent on your income – rich and poor are in the same system, the best guaranty of quality.

In the United States, under Obamacare, much still depends on your job or income. Lose your job or lose your income, and you might lose your existing health insurance or have to settle for lesser coverage.

Number 18:
In Canada, health care coverage stays with you for your entire life.

In the United States, under Obamacare, for tens of millions of Americans, health care coverage stays with you for as long as you can afford your share.

Number 17:
In Canada, you can freely choose your doctors and hospitals and keep them. There are no lists of “in-network” vendors and no extra hidden charges for going “out of network.”

In the United States, under Obamacare, the in-network list of places where you can get treated is shrinking – thus restricting freedom of choice – and if you want to go out of network, you pay for it.

Number 16:
In Canada, the health care system is funded by income, sales and corporate taxes that, combined, are much lower than what Americans pay in premiums.

In the United States, under Obamacare, for thousands of Americans, it’s pay or die – if you can’t pay, you die. That’s why many thousands will still die every year under Obamacare from lack of health insurance to get diagnosed and treated in time.

Number 15:
In Canada, there are no complex hospital or doctor bills. In fact, usually you don’t even see a bill.

In the United States, under Obamacare, hospital and doctor bills will still be terribly complex, making it impossible to discover the many costly overcharges.

Number 14:
In Canada, costs are controlled. Canada pays 10 percent of its GDP for its health care system, covering everyone.

In the United States, under Obamacare, costs continue to skyrocket. The U.S. currently pays 18 percent of its GDP and still doesn’t cover tens of millions of people.

Number 13:
In Canada, it is unheard of for anyone to go bankrupt due to health care costs.

In the United States, under Obamacare, health care driven bankruptcy will continue to plague Americans.

Number 12:
In Canada, simplicity leads to major savings in administrative costs and overhead.

In the United States, under Obamacare, complexity will lead to ratcheting up administrative costs and overhead.

Number 11:
In Canada, when you go to a doctor or hospital the first thing they ask you is: “What’s wrong?”

In the United States, the first thing they ask you is: “What kind of insurance do you have?”

Number 10:
In Canada, the government negotiates drug prices so they are more affordable.

In the United States, under Obamacare, Congress made it specifically illegal for the government to negotiate drug prices for volume purchases, so they remain unaffordable.

Number 9:
In Canada, the government health care funds are not profitably diverted to the top one percent.

In the United States, under Obamacare, health care funds will continue to flow to the top. In 2012, CEOs at six of the largest insurance companies in the U.S. received a total of $83.3 million in pay, plus benefits.

Number 8:
In Canada, there are no necessary co-pays or deductibles.

In the United States, under Obamacare, the deductibles and co-pays will continue to be unaffordable for many millions of Americans.

Number 7:
In Canada, the health care system contributes to social solidarity and national pride.

In the United States, Obamacare is divisive, with rich and poor in different systems and tens of millions left out or with sorely limited benefits.

Number 6:
In Canada, delays in health care are not due to the cost of insurance.

In the United States, under Obamacare, patients without health insurance or who are underinsured will continue to delay or forgo care and put their lives at risk.

Number 5:
In Canada, nobody dies due to lack of health insurance.

In the United States, under Obamacare, many thousands will continue to die every year due to lack of health insurance.

Number 4:
In Canada, an increasing majority supports their health care system, which costs half as much, per person, as in the United States. And in Canada, everyone is covered.

In the United States, a majority – many for different reasons – oppose Obamacare.

Number 3:
In Canada, the tax payments to fund the health care system are progressive – the lowest 20 percent pays 6 percent of income into the system while the highest 20 percent pays 8 percent.

In the United States, under Obamacare, the poor pay a larger share of their income for health care than the affluent.

Number 2:
In Canada, the administration of the system is simple. You get a health care card when you are born. And you swipe it when you go to a doctor or hospital. End of story.

In the United States, Obamacare’s 2,500 pages plus regulations (the Canadian Medicare Bill was 13 pages) is so complex that then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said before passage “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”

Number 1:
In Canada, the majority of citizens love their health care system.

In the United States, the majority of citizens, physicians, and nurses prefer the Canadian type system – single-payer, free choice of doctor and hospital , everybody in, nobody out.

---------------

For more information see Single Payer Action.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/22-1

146 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Damn you Ralph!! My Corvair WAS safe. Thanks for the seat belts though Dude Autumn Nov 2013 #1
GM could easily have fixed them, as always it was a corporate decision made Egalitarian Thug Nov 2013 #4
In the end, all that matters are the corporations, they can afford to buy the narrative. Autumn Nov 2013 #6
"Repeal and replace" is the motto of Republicans and their asswipe allies on the left. nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #2
And yet how many time have they voted to repeal, Mr.Bill Nov 2013 #31
I think your answers are 45 and ZERO! George II Nov 2013 #61
I understand you consider Ralph Nader WowSeriously Nov 2013 #46
If you intend to 'make' them repeal the ACA you are playing for geek tragedy Nov 2013 #81
I intend to "make" single payer a reality. What Republican plan do you intend to settle for next? WowSeriously Nov 2013 #87
No, I support expanding the good parts of the ACA. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #102
As is your prerogative. WowSeriously Nov 2013 #115
Show us the 'asswipes' on the left who call for that AgingAmerican Nov 2013 #84
From the OP and article: geek tragedy Nov 2013 #86
Advocating single payer makes us asswipes? Enthusiast Nov 2013 #97
No. People who prefer the ACA to the current status quo aren't calling for it to be repealed. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #101
Eeeeek! Nader! Get thee hence, Satan! LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #3
Coming soon to a website near you....NADER 2016 jessie04 Nov 2013 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #7
Conservatives are not normally prone to praising the Canadian health care system Fumesucker Nov 2013 #9
"Repeal and replace" puts Nader in some pretty spiffy company. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #18
Frothy Mix, Rmoney, Orangeman and Cruz are in favor of single payer? Fumesucker Nov 2013 #21
Anyone who states ACA repeal could be followed by single payer geek tragedy Nov 2013 #23
What are the incorrect statements regarding the differences between the two systems? Fumesucker Nov 2013 #25
Kind of like asking if a dolphin can swim better than a hippo. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #85
What does that have to do with the question I asked? Fumesucker Nov 2013 #98
No, what you're not grasping is that there is no "single payer" button that one geek tragedy Nov 2013 #100
I predicted the private mandate right here in GD on Nov 19, 2008 Fumesucker Nov 2013 #131
Krugman was right all along about the mandate. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #133
If you can't afford to make use of the insurance you are forced to buy it's not really "universal" Fumesucker Nov 2013 #138
If everyone could afford to use their insurance, it would have to cost more NoOneMan Nov 2013 #139
"can't afford to make use . . ." geek tragedy Nov 2013 #140
The financial reality of an under $8.00 minumum wage and sub 30 hour work weeks Fumesucker Nov 2013 #142
2 questions.. pangaia Nov 2013 #43
Repeal and replace means repeal and nothing else. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #82
OK. pangaia Nov 2013 #112
So does Nader == Santorum? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #132
Nader and Santorum both want to screw everyone who's being helped by geek tragedy Nov 2013 #134
I thought Santorum (and now Nader) was the discharge after the screwing NoOneMan Nov 2013 #136
number 14 is wrong dsc Dec 2013 #146
This should prove amusing Fumesucker Nov 2013 #8
These threads always are, here, share my couch Autumn Nov 2013 #10
Gore/ Nader 2016 LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #14
Lieberman/Nader 2016 Fumesucker Nov 2013 #15
Beautiful. LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #16
:>)))))))))))))))))))))))) pangaia Nov 2013 #44
Nader! otherone Nov 2013 #11
It all sounds good to me, of course I'm not Canadian so I only get to buy insurance. Autumn Nov 2013 #12
Isn't the ACA health care - if enough people say so truedelphi Nov 2013 #32
Health insurance is not health care. Autumn Nov 2013 #34
Totally agree. Sorry if I made the point in a confusing truedelphi Nov 2013 #123
Of course, such thoughts occurred to Nader only under a Democratic Administration. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #13
just like with Snowden! MisterP Nov 2013 #45
Snowden never had boxes in his garage during the Bush administration. DisgustipatedinCA Nov 2013 #68
and I once saw a picture of a ballerino who looked like Nader! MisterP Nov 2013 #122
Pretty sure Nader has always been a vocal supporter of a single payer system. nt eqfan592 Nov 2013 #50
I'm not an expert on Nader... NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #54
The bidness of 'murika is bidness. Bidness must be free from governmental regulation and oversight indepat Nov 2013 #17
RW ideology in a nutshell: LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #22
That's what the insurance companies lobbyists that wrote their provisions in the ACA said...n/t jtuck004 Nov 2013 #29
If Nader was to write that "water is good"... NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #19
I had a colonoscopy last week. pangaia Nov 2013 #47
I've never had the "pleasure." NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #49
Actually, its not bad at all you just...... pangaia Nov 2013 #55
I don't even want to think where you were going with that thought. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #57
Me neither. pangaia Nov 2013 #59
Let's hope they don't find out Nader breathes air. QC Nov 2013 #62
The bastard probably drives a car with airbags too. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #64
He's a big ole meanie!!! QC Nov 2013 #65
still waiting for someone to point out the inaccuracies in this list. niyad Nov 2013 #20
Their greatest hits compilation.. Fumesucker Nov 2013 #24
I don't understand..there are many VOCAL Canadian DU'ers here. I'd like to KoKo Nov 2013 #26
Now koKo, some of them are very vocal on our "health care" Autumn Nov 2013 #30
There is a Host of this Group who is very vocal and I'd hoped that He/She KoKo Nov 2013 #33
I know what you mean, KoKo. Seems like the perfect opportunity to compare the two. LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #37
Only one Canadian (declared) posting...and we know there are others... KoKo Nov 2013 #69
But Canada's Thanksgiving is in October, isn't it? LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #94
I'll bite NoOneMan Nov 2013 #126
Did you not read the OP? It lists 21 stark differences Doctor_J Nov 2013 #124
Fear not! The source of this call out... er, I mean thread took the bait Number23 Nov 2013 #128
Number 2 and 21 are not strictly accurate. Monk06 Nov 2013 #27
number 21 madrchsod Nov 2013 #52
57,375 posts !!! Respecto !!!!! Monk06 Nov 2013 #99
yeah, the infant is usually covered under the mother's plan laundry_queen Nov 2013 #91
I lost my card NoOneMan Nov 2013 #127
Why are you assuming there are significant inaccuracies NoOneMan Nov 2013 #129
I didn't think I would have to explain it to anyone. as has been pointed out elsewhere in this niyad Nov 2013 #141
False ProSense Nov 2013 #28
LOL, "this asshole" wants single payer. Count me in. and about 75% of posters here! n-t Logical Nov 2013 #40
Really? Well, ProSense Nov 2013 #41
I don't agree that Nader is aligning himself with RW assholes at all. pangaia Nov 2013 #51
Medicaid eligibility TexasBushwhacker Nov 2013 #66
Similar ProSense Nov 2013 #107
Good to know TexasBushwhacker Dec 2013 #145
Medicaid expansion is doing great things in Democratic States, but not in the States of the Bluenorthwest Nov 2013 #103
What? ProSense Nov 2013 #106
"the poor pay a larger share of their income for health care than the affluent" NoOneMan Nov 2013 #130
we are frequent travelers to Canada - the latest trip a little over a month ago DrDan Nov 2013 #35
Same with me, I ask a lot also. They love it. And how many want Aetna up there to replace.... Logical Nov 2013 #39
An Norway, and Denmark, and Finland, and the UK pangaia Nov 2013 #53
I can't wait to hear from Sid. rug Nov 2013 #36
He prefers for profit insurance over his health care (judging by his posts) with only one caveat, Dragonfli Nov 2013 #76
One Canadian tourist practically shouted to me "Obamacare is NEVER going to work!" ErikJ Nov 2013 #38
Mr. Nader is right I came to Canada in 72 and have had two children born here joelz Nov 2013 #42
this was discussed here several years ago about the canadian system madrchsod Nov 2013 #48
Also laundry_queen Nov 2013 #72
I remember in the 80's during Reagan there were News Stories about KoKo Nov 2013 #74
thanks for the info. madrchsod Nov 2013 #137
Number 8 and Number 14 are false...nt SidDithers Nov 2013 #56
Could you elaborate please? nt eqfan592 Nov 2013 #58
... QC Nov 2013 #92
Cost is not controlled at 10%... SidDithers Nov 2013 #108
Gotcha, thanks. nt eqfan592 Nov 2013 #110
I've never seen the OHP before NoOneMan Nov 2013 #135
i got into a conversation with a canadian a couple of weeks ago. that person told me that if a locdlib Nov 2013 #60
The knee replacement thing is variable. laundry_queen Nov 2013 #70
My grandma waited about 6 months to get knee replacement surgery, and that's in the US... Humanist_Activist Nov 2013 #116
Several inaccuracies, to varying degrees: JBoy Nov 2013 #63
Thanks...was looking for discussion from those who live in Canada... KoKo Nov 2013 #67
re: What you said about #8 laundry_queen Nov 2013 #71
Fairly accurate. laundry_queen Nov 2013 #73
Thanks for your experience on this. I still haven't found US Plan for Dental KoKo Nov 2013 #75
I love NHS and will happily pay more to make sure everyone is covered. Including non-citizens. idwiyo Nov 2013 #77
One Canadian input quakerboy Nov 2013 #78
Several other States will join Vermont, but ACA does not allow Vermont or any State to create Bluenorthwest Nov 2013 #105
Something is better than nothing. Especially if the future promises improvement quakerboy Nov 2013 #143
how long has canada been at it? ACA hasnt even officially started yet and he is comparing seabeyond Nov 2013 #79
All I have to say, is that our national system didn't come about overnight either, polly7 Nov 2013 #80
Number 22: Because of the idiot who ran on the Green Ticket in 2000 and gave us 8 years Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #83
Ignoring the fact the Gore actually won Florida but failed to call for a statewide recount WowSeriously Nov 2013 #88
Correct on all points except one word. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #89
The reason I don't include Nader as one of the reasons Al Gore lost WowSeriously Nov 2013 #114
Nader is wrong about repeal. ACA provides for state single payer in 2017 eridani Nov 2013 #90
So then why demand that States spend millions during the interim? Why not let us have single Bluenorthwest Nov 2013 #104
This article from 2009 gives a good explanation: Raine1967 Nov 2013 #111
The New Yorker article is interesting read now that ACA is finally KoKo Nov 2013 #119
I thought so as well. Knowing how other countries health plans developed Raine1967 Nov 2013 #121
A diverse, North American nation can be progressive. Thanks, Canada. n/t pampango Nov 2013 #93
Found this on DU from 2009: Raine1967 Nov 2013 #95
No to repeal. Just shift over. I can't afford my grandfathered policy for even one more year. mmonk Nov 2013 #96
Of course he's right. CanSocDem Nov 2013 #109
Well that was guaranteed to get a lot of response, lol. LWolf Nov 2013 #113
What? progressoid Nov 2013 #117
There's a one room cabin in a deep, impenetrable forest. gulliver Nov 2013 #118
repeal and replace...where have i heard that before? spanone Nov 2013 #120
I completely agree with Nader adieu Nov 2013 #125
"Raine1967" at #111 with the Link from the New Yorker KoKo Nov 2013 #144
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Uh Oh! It's Nader: "...