Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

starroute

(12,977 posts)
9. The starting point for me is that human beings *love* to conspire together
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 02:30 AM
Nov 2013

Little kids form clubs and hatch secret plots and keep other little kids out. Archaic culture all over the world have secret societies with special rituals and methods of scaring off the uninitiated. I'm more than half convinced that humans invented language in the first place so that we could communicate our secrets in whispers instead of hooting across the clearing like chimpanzees.

So from that perspective, it would be surprising if there were no conspiracies in our own culture. I think that when people argue about conspiracy theories, the question is not whether conspiracies exist but how powerful they are, how deeply they reach into the centers of power, how willing they are to undertake criminal acts, and how easily they can get away with them.

I mean, everybody knows that the Republicans are colluding to try to undercut President Obama. That's so obvious, it would be ridiculous to try to deny it. But if somebody claimed that John Boehner was planning a military coup or an assassination, the most likely reaction would be, "Yeah, right. And would you like to buy this bridge in Brooklyn?"

In other words, the real line to draw is not between conspiracies and no-conspiracies, but between plausible conspiracies and implausible ones. In the case of the Kennedy assassination and a few other episodes, the stakes are so high and the events so shocking that it becomes very difficult to know where to draw that line. But I do think that what we're really arguing about here is not whether there *was* a conspiracy to kill Kennedy but whether it's plausible that there might have been. And that, I think, should be a legitimate subject for discussion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Laying it out there...Conspiracy Theories [View all] ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 OP
You go girl!!! Suich Nov 2013 #1
Suich! ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #12
Well, I respect you hugely, my dear ScreamingMeemie... CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2013 #2
Thank you CP ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #13
Holy cow... as if you came to a discussion board.. to discuss! villager Nov 2013 #3
It's an odd turn we've taken on so many things. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #14
Do you think Paul Wellstone's plane was sabotaged or shot down? Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #4
I believe both were tragic accidents. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #6
I shouted out "who killed the Kennedys" flamingdem Nov 2013 #5
...and just as I was looking for something to listen to as I worked. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #15
It is nice of the overlords of the underground... RobertEarl Nov 2013 #7
It's when we stop, or disallow, the discussion of these ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #16
NTSB says differently regarding flight 587 Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #8
It wasn't automatic. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #10
The starting point for me is that human beings *love* to conspire together starroute Nov 2013 #9
Very well said, starroute ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #11
If I were on a jury about your OP blue14u Nov 2013 #17
I believe Vincent Bugliosi -and he says .................... ErikJ Nov 2013 #18
Even if you believe Oswald did it, that leaves many unanswered questions starroute Nov 2013 #19
"There are a lot of festering questions about the Deep State activities of the early 60s..." scarletwoman Nov 2013 #21
Thank you for your civility. nt PCIntern Nov 2013 #20
Thank you for this very lovely post! scarletwoman Nov 2013 #22
... Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Laying it out there...Con...»Reply #9