Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
108. What experts?
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 03:08 AM
Nov 2013

Your mate DiEugenio who claims that Oswald never owned any rifle, that the order slip and the money order with Oswald's handwriting and the rifle being shipped to Oswald's post office box and the photos and negatives of Oswald with the rifle and his wife's testimony that he owned the rifle are all faked and forged and a frame? The experts who told you that Oswald was "impersonated" in Mexico city and never mentioned that he was identified positively by multiple people from the Cuban consulate, that his photo was on his visa application, that his signature was on it as well as on a hotel register? If these are the "experts" you rely on then it's no wonder you can't really come up with anything but easily debunked nonsense.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Your framing is weird but DURHAM D Nov 2013 #1
No, no, not with the discussion. Seeking Serenity Nov 2013 #5
The Onion sums it all up rurallib Nov 2013 #2
I know this Onion piece has been posted over and over again, and I believe Oswald acted alone, ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #11
You do understand the article isn't making fun of the assassination, but of conspiracy believers... eqfan592 Nov 2013 #14
do you believe actual Democrats find Kennedy's murder a joking matter? reddread Nov 2013 #17
It's funny CFLDem Nov 2013 #32
+1 I totally agree el_bryanto Nov 2013 #44
The Onion is written by people too young to remember or care whathehell Nov 2013 #73
may I ask how old you are? grasswire Nov 2013 #3
I'm 46. Seeking Serenity Nov 2013 #7
a government conspiracy? grasswire Nov 2013 #12
And no. grasswire Nov 2013 #16
You weren't there, you don't understand. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #35
Ruby still remains a puzzle to me. arcane1 Nov 2013 #52
twas the loss of questionseverything Nov 2013 #53
Not to mention that the only bullet that was found and subjected to ballistics tests BlueStreak Nov 2013 #58
Very well put. Thank you. pangaia Nov 2013 #45
Same reason that some people cringe whenever they hear that mindless "American exceptionalism" crap BlueStreak Nov 2013 #56
Thank you for educating those too young to remember it. n/t whathehell Nov 2013 #76
We want truth. Cooley Hurd Nov 2013 #4
The "conspiracy of the gaps" argument. nt eqfan592 Nov 2013 #15
Riddle me this: Kennedy didn't invade Cuba during Bay of Pigs OR the Cuban Missile Crisis... Cooley Hurd Nov 2013 #70
Yeah, because people, especially those that are very mentally ill... eqfan592 Nov 2013 #71
No, but they make great tools for people who don't want to their own dirty work, for obvious sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #80
Are you joking? eqfan592 Nov 2013 #84
No, I'm not joking. If you wanted to hire a hitman, would you be looking for someone rational sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #86
Everything i presented? Literally NOTHING i presented was speculation! eqfan592 Nov 2013 #88
Do you have a link to that fact? I agree he did not act rationally but I have never seen sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #90
Here's one. eqfan592 Nov 2013 #93
Did you know that the United States House Select Committee concluded that there was a conspiracy? NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #6
Did you know that the only evidence they had to make that conclusion turned out to be non-credible? Bolo Boffin Nov 2013 #8
nobody knows that, because it ISNT TRUE reddread Nov 2013 #13
I haven't said anything that isn't true. Bolo Boffin Nov 2013 #41
I never called it a trump card. I offer it for to the author of this OP for it's context. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #18
I called it a trump card because that's how you're using it. Bolo Boffin Nov 2013 #37
the actual conclusion of an investigation hobbled by CIA intransigence and supervised by Joannides reddread Nov 2013 #10
Put your faith in one who seeks the truth. Doubt anyone who claims to have found it. Scuba Nov 2013 #9
Question anyone who only communicates through quotes... eqfan592 Nov 2013 #19
Question everyone. Scuba Nov 2013 #20
Above all, question authority. scarletwoman Nov 2013 #24
I think the first questions we should ask of authority are ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #68
Question some, get beer and party with others. eqfan592 Nov 2013 #25
Keeping the Party Going Is Way More Important Than Truth Upward Nov 2013 #51
That's a great quote. BlueStreak Nov 2013 #60
lol be my guest. :) eqfan592 Nov 2013 #61
If all roads led noise Nov 2013 #21
I have heard that. The lack of balance Seeking Serenity Nov 2013 #22
I think this view comes from a misunderstanding of ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #69
I found the opposite to be true, personally. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #48
actually the more you look at the case, the more credible Schema Thing Nov 2013 #65
Why is it so important for some people scarletwoman Nov 2013 #23
I merely asked why some people are so committed to the conspiracy idea. Seeking Serenity Nov 2013 #26
Committed to learning the truth ... MindMover Nov 2013 #31
In your OP you ask, why it is "so hard to accept that a great man like Kennedy was killed by an... scarletwoman Nov 2013 #38
I think what I hate worse is being told "you weren't alive so you don't know"... cynatnite Nov 2013 #36
So, history should only be recounted by those who did not live through it scarletwoman Nov 2013 #39
I never said that... cynatnite Nov 2013 #40
I'm not trying to invalidate YOUR opinion, I'm just fighting back against those scarletwoman Nov 2013 #47
i'm 72 years old. the warren commission report DesertFlower Nov 2013 #27
I'm 71 and it never felt right to me then either, and nothing in government has been shraby Nov 2013 #67
And the Dr. who witnessed Kennedy's lifeless body ... MindMover Nov 2013 #28
What is the definition of a conspiracy? Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #29
You're approaching this from the wrong direction DisgustipatedinCA Nov 2013 #30
As someone who was a young person of voting age at the time it happened, I highly recommend enough Nov 2013 #33
Maybe for some it's impossible to consider that it was one person who did the shooting. n/t cynatnite Nov 2013 #34
Because it became a pattern, always benefiting the same political actors villager Nov 2013 #42
Why is it so important to some that it WASN'T? PeteSelman Nov 2013 #43
^^ This ^^ Myrina Nov 2013 #50
The truth is important for some people. former9thward Nov 2013 #46
dumb fascisthunter Nov 2013 #49
For my family GP6971 Nov 2013 #54
Three members of the Warren Commission dflprincess Nov 2013 #55
At this point it doesn't matter madville Nov 2013 #57
"Those who ignore the past are doomed to repeat it" dflprincess Nov 2013 #59
your country today... grasswire Nov 2013 #91
Because that's what the FACTS show. Octafish Nov 2013 #62
Which "facts" are those? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #72
For starters: The FBI destroyed evidence. Octafish Nov 2013 #77
And? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #78
The Warren Commission says Oswald shot three times in six seconds. Octafish Nov 2013 #79
8.3 seconds. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #85
LOL. That's what BUGLIOSI ASSUMES in his book. Octafish Nov 2013 #89
Easily refuted. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #92
When did you read Bugliosi's book, my friend? n/t zappaman Nov 2013 #94
An expert read it and told me it's bogus. Octafish Nov 2013 #95
Oh, so you comment on things you haven't read. zappaman Nov 2013 #96
Would love to see your response to post 92. eqfan592 Nov 2013 #97
Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #98
You will never get an answer...that's his M.O. zappaman Nov 2013 #99
Why waste time? Octafish Nov 2013 #100
Yeah, that's what i thought. eqfan592 Nov 2013 #103
You clearly don't understand them. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #105
Hell, even in that situation i could probably still get 3 shots off faster... eqfan592 Nov 2013 #109
Hmmm RobertEarl Nov 2013 #101
Did you watch a different video? eqfan592 Nov 2013 #102
Just read the words on link. RobertEarl Nov 2013 #104
Why not watch the video that I'm clearly referring to? eqfan592 Nov 2013 #106
There is a video. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #107
What experts? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #108
I think it would be incumbent upon investigators to prove it wasn't a hit elias7 Nov 2013 #63
You can't prove a negative. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #74
Oswald was getting ready to sing .. that's why Ruby took him out. duh. YOHABLO Nov 2013 #64
What people desire is the truth, which is a lot different than ... MrMickeysMom Nov 2013 #66
Your framing is strange...There is no "need" to believe it's a conspiracy and about 70 to 80 % whathehell Nov 2013 #75
Why is it important that you believe Politicalboi Nov 2013 #81
look at the "no conspiracy" people here on DU U4ikLefty Nov 2013 #82
If there is a hidden history behind his death then arthritisR_US Nov 2013 #83
I think it was Karl Rove using the government's time machine, hughee99 Nov 2013 #87
Did Not Have To Be... Release EVERY DOCUMENT RELEVANT...Right Now.. WillyT Nov 2013 #110
I think it's you who thinks they HAVE to believe. Believe me, conspiracy was the last thing on ancianita Nov 2013 #111
You don't understand it HangOnKids Nov 2013 #112
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is it so important fo...»Reply #108