Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Uh Oh! It's Nader: "21 Ways Why Canada's Health Care is Better."--Any DU Canadians Care to Discuss? [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)82. Repeal and replace means repeal and nothing else.
It means the same thing when Nader says it as it did when Rick Santorum said it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Uh Oh! It's Nader: "21 Ways Why Canada's Health Care is Better."--Any DU Canadians Care to Discuss? [View all]
KoKo
Nov 2013
OP
GM could easily have fixed them, as always it was a corporate decision made
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2013
#4
In the end, all that matters are the corporations, they can afford to buy the narrative.
Autumn
Nov 2013
#6
"Repeal and replace" is the motto of Republicans and their asswipe allies on the left. nt
geek tragedy
Nov 2013
#2
I intend to "make" single payer a reality. What Republican plan do you intend to settle for next?
WowSeriously
Nov 2013
#87
No. People who prefer the ACA to the current status quo aren't calling for it to be repealed.
geek tragedy
Nov 2013
#101
Conservatives are not normally prone to praising the Canadian health care system
Fumesucker
Nov 2013
#9
What are the incorrect statements regarding the differences between the two systems?
Fumesucker
Nov 2013
#25
No, what you're not grasping is that there is no "single payer" button that one
geek tragedy
Nov 2013
#100
If you can't afford to make use of the insurance you are forced to buy it's not really "universal"
Fumesucker
Nov 2013
#138
The financial reality of an under $8.00 minumum wage and sub 30 hour work weeks
Fumesucker
Nov 2013
#142
It all sounds good to me, of course I'm not Canadian so I only get to buy insurance.
Autumn
Nov 2013
#12
Of course, such thoughts occurred to Nader only under a Democratic Administration.
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#13
Snowden never had boxes in his garage during the Bush administration.
DisgustipatedinCA
Nov 2013
#68
Pretty sure Nader has always been a vocal supporter of a single payer system. nt
eqfan592
Nov 2013
#50
The bidness of 'murika is bidness. Bidness must be free from governmental regulation and oversight
indepat
Nov 2013
#17
That's what the insurance companies lobbyists that wrote their provisions in the ACA said...n/t
jtuck004
Nov 2013
#29
I know what you mean, KoKo. Seems like the perfect opportunity to compare the two.
LuvNewcastle
Nov 2013
#37
I didn't think I would have to explain it to anyone. as has been pointed out elsewhere in this
niyad
Nov 2013
#141
LOL, "this asshole" wants single payer. Count me in. and about 75% of posters here! n-t
Logical
Nov 2013
#40
Medicaid expansion is doing great things in Democratic States, but not in the States of the
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#103
"the poor pay a larger share of their income for health care than the affluent"
NoOneMan
Nov 2013
#130
Same with me, I ask a lot also. They love it. And how many want Aetna up there to replace....
Logical
Nov 2013
#39
He prefers for profit insurance over his health care (judging by his posts) with only one caveat,
Dragonfli
Nov 2013
#76
One Canadian tourist practically shouted to me "Obamacare is NEVER going to work!"
ErikJ
Nov 2013
#38
i got into a conversation with a canadian a couple of weeks ago. that person told me that if a
locdlib
Nov 2013
#60
My grandma waited about 6 months to get knee replacement surgery, and that's in the US...
Humanist_Activist
Nov 2013
#116
I love NHS and will happily pay more to make sure everyone is covered. Including non-citizens.
idwiyo
Nov 2013
#77
Several other States will join Vermont, but ACA does not allow Vermont or any State to create
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#105
Something is better than nothing. Especially if the future promises improvement
quakerboy
Nov 2013
#143
how long has canada been at it? ACA hasnt even officially started yet and he is comparing
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#79
All I have to say, is that our national system didn't come about overnight either,
polly7
Nov 2013
#80
Number 22: Because of the idiot who ran on the Green Ticket in 2000 and gave us 8 years
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#83
Ignoring the fact the Gore actually won Florida but failed to call for a statewide recount
WowSeriously
Nov 2013
#88
So then why demand that States spend millions during the interim? Why not let us have single
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#104