Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
11. but is it really ZERO sum?
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 11:11 AM
Nov 2013

The factory is not dealing with a fixed pool, the factory creates things.

If the bosses treat their workers better, then their workers CAN, and perhaps will, create MORE things. Because as a worker I have some power. I can strive to increase production and work hard, or I can slack, or otherwise deliberately strive to reduce production.

Which I have. BOOM!

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/12

Further, I cut them in ways where they didn't even know they were bleeding.

And that wasn't the first time. At my first factory job in a satellite dish factory. When we had a holiday, the factory bosses would make us work nine hour shifts on the other four days, because they could get four hours of extra production without paying overtime for it.

Personally, I thought the longer work days sucked and it pissed me off that they ruined my four day week that way. So I did my best to only get 8 hours worth of production done in the nine hours.

In some ways though, I am not sure they cared. After they laid a bunch of us off (they were making BIG satellite dishes, after all, and that market kinda collapsed). I stopped by one day and asked to see their numbers. They had two people producing 1400 on the drill presses. I could do 1200 by myself no sweat. It would make sense, if they cared about production to get rid of one of those two and hire me, but they didn't want to do that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

AutoChomskyDURec KG Nov 2013 #1
Excellent article. k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #2
Can't find much in there to disagree with. Minimum wage with no benefits is the new Flatulo Nov 2013 #3
He pretty well nails it. nt Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #4
Okay DUers, from now on its "working class" not "middle class", say it everywhere. nt MrYikes Nov 2013 #5
Revolutionary socialist here. Been using working class all along....... socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #6
I've always hated the term "middle class" hfojvt Nov 2013 #7
I've referred to myself and my peers as working class for some time now. Should be said with pride Populist_Prole Nov 2013 #19
One thing he gets very well here, although he doesn't say it outright...... socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #8
but is it really ZERO sum? hfojvt Nov 2013 #11
Anecdotal evidence doesn't take away from the systemic rules........ socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #12
it provides an example hfojvt Nov 2013 #13
This might be an "agree to disagree" moment..... socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #14
but even our oligopoly capitalism is not designed that way hfojvt Nov 2013 #18
Although I do agree with the argument that capitalism is a war truedelphi Nov 2013 #17
I note the way Chomsky bashes unions here hfojvt Nov 2013 #9
Yep. That's called an "aristocracy of labor" (I'm sure you knew that)......... socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #10
And in this regard, they deserve a bashing or two. Unions are great when they work, Egalitarian Thug Nov 2013 #15
Chomsky Has it Right colsohlibgal Nov 2013 #16
We saw Moyers last night too PasadenaTrudy Nov 2013 #21
Great article. Thank you. emsimon33 Nov 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chomsky: Business Elites ...»Reply #11