General Discussion

DanTex

(20,709 posts)

8. What the Bushes or Reagan or Nixon said has nothing to do with JFK's assassination.

Sun Nov 24, 2013, 02:38 PM

Nov 2013

I trust the witnesses, ballistic evidence, fingerprints, the fact that the rifle found was owned by Lee Harvey Oswald, etc. None of that has anything to do with Bush or Nixon. The fact that I don't trust Nixon doesn't mean that everything that everything that anyone associated with the government at any level has been a lie.

What exactly is the connection to JFK? Do you think Bush organized a team of people to plant the rifle and the shell casings at the TSBD and put Oswald's fingerprints there? Do you think the man who saw Oswald shooting from the window and told Dallas police about it was actually a deep-cover Nixon operative?

If everything the government says is a lie, maybe JFK wasn't assassinated after all! Maybe he was still in charge, calling all the shots, and he was just sick of all the attention. Or maybe he wasn't even president in the first place. Where does the lunacy end?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The JFK Assassination and American Conspiracy Culture by Jonathan Earle [View all] The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 OP

Kicking for the Sunday readers. nt The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #1

Here's the problem RobertEarl Nov 2013 #2

It's got nothing to do with trusting authority. DanTex Nov 2013 #3

Has everything to do with trust RobertEarl Nov 2013 #5

Let's see Bush lied, Reagan lied, and therefore our government lied re JFK. duffyduff Nov 2013 #6

What the Bushes or Reagan or Nixon said has nothing to do with JFK's assassination. DanTex Nov 2013 #8

Wow RobertEarl Nov 2013 #10

As usual, you ignore the part about the actual evidence. DanTex Nov 2013 #11

And your first sentence sums up yours. "Wow." The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #12

Question away. Who is stopping you? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #4

What does "ecumenical" mean to you? RobertEarl Nov 2013 #7

This thread isn't really about me. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #9

Bush was also CIA head RobertEarl Nov 2013 #13

Has jack shit to do with the OP and proves nothing. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #14

Wow, that's fascinating! DanTex Nov 2013 #15

"Conspiracy culture"? IMO, that's a well-fitting shoe. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16

Those are good examples of revealed conspiracies. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #17

Simply because there are those who refuse to accept strong circumstantial evidence does not WinkyDink Nov 2013 #18

Comparing JFK conspiracies to the Simpson murder is truly preposterous. DanTex Nov 2013 #19

Much easier to prove Oswald not alone than that he was KurtNYC Nov 2013 #20

... DanTex Nov 2013 #24

Thanks for a factual post. duffyduff Nov 2013 #26

Your post confirms many of the facts I cite KurtNYC Nov 2013 #28

Huh? What facts would those be? DanTex Nov 2013 #33

B.S. It's a fact he acted alone. duffyduff Nov 2013 #25

What ''conspiracy-relishing coverage of the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination''? Octafish Nov 2013 #21

Yes, Dr. Earle is "coming from" the profession of history. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #22

No, he's ''coming from'' the profession of disinformationist. Octafish Nov 2013 #23

Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. DanTex Nov 2013 #27

Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. Ichingcarpenter Nov 2013 #29

LOL. "your story is full of holes" DanTex Nov 2013 #30

So what? Oswald in Mexico City was no misidentification. Octafish Nov 2013 #32

That's all pure speculation. DanTex Nov 2013 #35

Thanks for knocking down this strawman... MinM Nov 2013 #34

Well, he's a tenured professor at a state university and teaches a course in conspiracy theory. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #37

The two biggest contribution to ongoing conspiracy theories is ... Vox Moi Nov 2013 #31

It is clear you did not read the thread. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #36