Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
28. It's hard to blame just one entity in this mess... Hell, we could perhaps blame BP the most!
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 03:40 PM
Nov 2013

Since it was the company that eventually became BP that was being "threatened" by Iran's democratically elected leader in earlier times who was looking to perhaps nationalize oil company operations at the time that lead to Great Britain getting the U.S. to help them oust that leadership and replace it with an unelected dictator in the Shah with the likes of Savak secret police wreaking havoc on the population of Iran for decades up until they revolved in their revolution.

Do I like who's in charge now of Iran? Hell no. The Ayatollah and his crowd were opportunists that utilized the problems associated with the country having horrendous literacy rates while under the Shah to rally support locally around the country with the mullahs, etc. to help them throw out the Americans then and give them powers they shouldn't have.

The ironic part of the Ayatollah's leadership is that they helped promote literacy a lot to encourage Iranians to read more religious Islamic texts that they sought to control being the staple of what they read. But instead, they got a far more educated and literate populace with the next generation of Iranians who weren't a part of the hostage taking crisis, etc. then that:

1) were able to bypass these restrictions when the internet started to rise to prominence. The internet gave them the view of the rest of the world that previous generations didn't have. And the current Iranian regime's attempts to control access to the internet and information in general is more at odds with the freedoms that they see on the internet and that they want.
2) no longer suffered directly at the hands of the Savak secret police of the Shah, which was the core of many Iranians hatred of the U.S. who worked with that entity a lot during the Shah's time.
3) with the U.S. having no direct complicity after that arms deal in any of the current actions of the government, many of them feel it hard to blame the U.S. for their current problems the way that previous generations blamed the U.S. for the actions of the Shah's regime.
4) have had direct effect through protests and recent elections in the recent changes of Iranian's leadership (even though the reins are still held by the religious elites) to be less inflammatory in its rhetoric on the world stage.

Now that being said, if we "teach Iran a lesson" by attacking them, or doing something else that's equally provocative in trying to take them back to the times that they hated under the Shah, we will completely lose the wins that we might have for the future with this new generation of Iranians. We need to utilize this generation as an opportunity to restore some search for more democratic rule there, and hopefully when the new generation can gain more power as the older Ayatollah's elites die off, we might have a decent ally, if we don't have a foreign policy dictated by protecting oil supplies and the corporate entities that control that that have screwed us there and so many other places in the past.

As I said, I don't "love" Iran's government and many of the people there are problematic on the world stage, but there are many people I know personally that have been a direct part of events from then who I do love as good friends, and appreciate their perspective that helps shape my feelings and understanding that I put forth here.

Another country that's going through some of its own crises recently though quite different in many ways, has similar internal tensions and battles for control of their future direction is Turkey, where I lived a good portion of my childhood during the times of the Shah that lead up to the point of the revolution not long after that time. By keeping up with events there, I also see a country that has many problems but many accomplishments, and many good and bad things happening to it that need a more nuanced and detailed look at before making judgements to do some extreme measures to respond to what is happening there too.

What we need to do rather than send Iran a message of not putting up with what happened in the hostage crisis, is to send a strong message that we will come down hard on the Oliver Norths and other corrupt entities in our own government that have screwed both Iran AND the middle class and the American populace in general over the years. If we want more influence in world events and be looked on as a voice of leadership there, fixing the fascist elements in our own government that have been a part of the ills that happened in Iran and other places, and has hurt us as well would be far better than flexing our military force muscle that has gotten us in to trouble more than it has helped us impose our will every where else.

I don't think it was Iran's intention Turbineguy Nov 2013 #1
You sure? zbdent Nov 2013 #3
I meant when they took the hostages. Turbineguy Nov 2013 #11
So was I ... zbdent Nov 2013 #46
It's tricky to place blame, I admit. Laelth Nov 2013 #47
what goes around comes around... magical thyme Nov 2013 #2
This. Skidmore Nov 2013 #4
+1 JHB Nov 2013 #5
I think I covered our complicity in the OP. Laelth Nov 2013 #48
I still blame us. We had no business propping up the Shah. magical thyme Nov 2013 #50
Like you, I am quite glad their current administration decided to pursue peace. Laelth Nov 2013 #54
CIA loyalty questioned at the time... Octafish Nov 2013 #6
...35 years ago.... n/t TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #7
Thanks for the response. Laelth Nov 2013 #49
Well, I did leave quite a bit to be inferred TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #52
On the other hand, it is ironic that we are allied with the sponsors of Sunni terrorism FarCenter Nov 2013 #8
As far as responsibility for a terrible leader in the other's country NuclearDem Nov 2013 #9
I also don't see the reason for any hate towards Iran. polly7 Nov 2013 #16
Reagan returned the favor by serving up 240 Marines as sitting ducks for a truck bomb geek tragedy Nov 2013 #10
Iran's Islamic Revolution gave us Reagan. Iggo Nov 2013 #12
scary reminder of our past. Sheri Nov 2013 #13
"I blame Iran." That's just stupid. I blame the CIA. So there. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2013 #14
Iran allied itself with the Republican Party in 1980/81. Laelth Nov 2013 #15
Blaming Iran for Reagan is like blaming Nader for Bush. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2013 #17
Crabbed? Cool word. Laelth Nov 2013 #18
A lot of the mess that was Iran and the oil crisis at the time was set in place before Carter... cascadiance Nov 2013 #30
There was no world wide web in 1981. BumRushDaShow Nov 2013 #19
Why did the CIA overthrow Iran's leftist prez? (Excuse my ignorance re this.) polichick Nov 2013 #20
He nationalized the oil industry. n/t Comrade Grumpy Nov 2013 #21
Quite true. Laelth Nov 2013 #22
Okay, you admit we overthrew their elected government for imperialist reasons... Comrade Grumpy Nov 2013 #25
I said we installed the Shah in the OP. Laelth Nov 2013 #37
No coup, no revolution. No revolution, no hostage crisis. solarhydrocan Nov 2013 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author polichick Nov 2013 #24
must see free HULU documentary will answer all questions solarhydrocan Nov 2013 #40
No wonder Eisenhower warned us about the mic... polichick Nov 2013 #45
Exactly .... tweeternik Nov 2013 #29
Gee, maybe we shouldn't have forcibly installed the former Shah. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #23
Carter deserves a lot of the blame for his handling of the mess. Drunken Irishman Nov 2013 #26
I don't recall thinking that at the time. Laelth Nov 2013 #35
And we gave them Shah Reza Scootaloo Nov 2013 #27
Why, thank you. Laelth Nov 2013 #36
Whatever. Your opinions lack the backing of fact Scootaloo Nov 2013 #38
You do know what the Shah was all about, don't you? Violet_Crumble Nov 2013 #42
OP US centric malletgirl02 Nov 2013 #43
It's hard to blame just one entity in this mess... Hell, we could perhaps blame BP the most! cascadiance Nov 2013 #28
That's an excellent post, and I am happy to let it stand without comment. Laelth Nov 2013 #57
And I want to add one more item that is positive for Iran's new generation. More educated women! cascadiance Nov 2013 #61
How many of the hostages did Iran kill?: zero cpwm17 Nov 2013 #31
Good post. AverageJoe90 Nov 2013 #32
Great post. Thanks. Laelth Nov 2013 #33
It was obvious to me from the very moment I started looking into it. AverageJoe90 Nov 2013 #34
remember: reagan sold arms illegally to iran and funneled the money to the contras spanone Nov 2013 #39
Hear, hear! n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #51
an act that would have a Democrat impeached & imprisoned. spanone Nov 2013 #56
There was more to it than that Major Nikon Nov 2013 #41
Could you elaborate on this part?: A-Schwarzenegger Nov 2013 #53
don't foget, that Reagan's staff stole stole the debate plan book from Carter gopiscrap Nov 2013 #55
i blame ted koppel + nightline. pansypoo53219 Nov 2013 #58
American addiction to fake cowboy machismo gave us both Iran and Reagan. Orsino Nov 2013 #59
Way too many generalizations... Xolodno Nov 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember this: Iran gave...»Reply #28