General Discussion

RandySF

(82,506 posts) Sun Nov 24, 2013, 05:16 PM Nov 2013

Judge Calls 13-Year-Old Girl Who Was Sexually Assaulted by a 41-Year-Old "Predatory" [View all]

This week in the UK, Judge Nigel Peters gave a suspended sentence to 41 year-old Neil Wilson after he pleaded guilty to “making extreme pornographic images and one count of sexual activity” with a 13 year-old girl. The judge explained his leniency as stemming from the fact that “the girl was predatory and was egging you on.” During the trial, the prosecution had declared the girl was “sexually experienced” and that “She appeared to look around 14 or 15 and had the mental age of a 14 or 15 year old despite being younger than that. There was sexual activity but it was not of Mr. Wilson’s doing, you might say it was forced upon him despite being older and stronger than her.” Law enforcement also found “a stash of images and videos depicting child abuse and bestiality” in Wilson’s home, but sure, the 13 year-old girl is the predator here.

http://www.alternet.org/judge-calls-13-year-old-girl-who-was-sexually-assaulted-41-year-old-predatory?page=0%2C0

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Calls 13-Year-Old Girl Who Was Sexually Assaulted by a 41-Year-Old "Predatory" [View all] RandySF Nov 2013 OP

FFS! In_The_Wind Nov 2013 #1

Oh, well she looked acted like she was 14 so that makes it all ok? And 41 had no ability to restrain uppityperson Nov 2013 #2

sure he was older and bigger but his peen tingled and BOOM elehhhhna Nov 2013 #17

Makes me wonder how big a child-abuse image stash that judge has at home. polly7 Nov 2013 #3

I thought the same thing. n/t CFLDem Nov 2013 #28

Talk about abusing the law, twisting it upside down. The judge needs to be removed from serving, Jefferson23 Nov 2013 #4

part of the sentence has been reviewd, and the judge is apparently under investigation niyad Nov 2013 #6

Excellent, thank you! n/t Jefferson23 Nov 2013 #11

thank you niyad... that just simply floors me. i would be so fuckin embarrassed that my seabeyond Nov 2013 #30

rec'ing because this disgusting crap needs to be widely known. rape culture is alive and well niyad Nov 2013 #5

Who knew that that girls and women had such powers? It's aupernatural, that's what it is! Excuse me freshwest Nov 2013 #20

this is the "honourable judge nigel peters " (gee, judge, what's in YOUR closet??) niyad Nov 2013 #7

(gee, judge, what's in YOUR closet??) exactly. nt seabeyond Nov 2013 #31

I'll bet that's not even his real hair. Orrex Nov 2013 #39

Didn't we just go through this in Montana? pokerfan Nov 2013 #8

and alabama more recently and calif.... nt seabeyond Nov 2013 #32

Wha--? ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #9

Good God Almighty arely staircase Nov 2013 #10

So she'd been raped in the past gollygee Nov 2013 #12

A sadly accurate summation etherealtruth Nov 2013 #15

point. i guess at this point all the men, the judge, prosecutor and rapist merely see seabeyond Nov 2013 #33

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #58

Really? Not even statatory rape? Does that not exist in the UK? bluesbassman Nov 2013 #60

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #62

A 13 yr old does not have the capacity to make it conensual. bluesbassman Nov 2013 #63

Perhaps someone should investigate this judge. Belgium can't have been unique. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #13

Ew ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #14

Perhaps my penis is defective because it's never jumped out of control mythology Nov 2013 #24

good for you men. i would be so insulted if i was a man reading this shit. damn... nt seabeyond Nov 2013 #34

Judges make decisions like this, and meanwhile non-predatory porn is being blocked outright. TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #16

What is porn not predatory? and thank god you are here to defend rapeporn elehhhhna Nov 2013 #18

All porn is predatory and/or rapeporn? Did I read that right? NickB79 Nov 2013 #21

Only rape porn is being blocked and only in the UK gollygee Nov 2013 #23

Oh, ok. Thanks NickB79 Nov 2013 #25

If you think all acts of human sexuality constitute violence towards women, I can't help you. TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #53

YOU made the statement it was being blocked. what is being blocked is RAPE porn. wtf are seabeyond Nov 2013 #56

I'm sorry, I have yet to see anything indicating that the UK will only block rape related content TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #65

ah, so you go from one made up accusation to another. where have i said ALL porn is rape. point it seabeyond Nov 2013 #66

Simple TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #68

one post.... one. yes. it is simple. you say whatever garbage as your argument and it fails seabeyond Nov 2013 #69

Keep waiting TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #70

so... another fail... just a made up story thrown out there with no basis. yup. #4 fail seabeyond Nov 2013 #71

you made up something very stoopid elehhhhna Nov 2013 #73

omg... some one afraid of losing their rape porn???? lmao. nt seabeyond Nov 2013 #35

What definition of rape is "non-predatory" BainsBane Nov 2013 #51

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #61

Throughout history men have tried to blame women for their bad behavior procon Nov 2013 #19

And, alas, have succeeded. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #43

That is the whole attitude behind the requirement in some societies tblue37 Nov 2013 #22

And people wonder why Texasgal Nov 2013 #26

exactly. wtf would us women be angry. hmmm. lets see. calif, montana, alabama, steubanville seabeyond Nov 2013 #36

and this brings up and important point. it is so hard for girls and women to step forward. so many seabeyond Nov 2013 #48

MEN wonder, is what I think you meant. :-) WinkyDink Nov 2013 #45

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #64

This is the real world impact of what we've been discussing all week BainsBane Nov 2013 #27

right on. seabeyond Nov 2013 #38

omg, men are you not embarassed as fuck that your gender is looked at so pathetically by this male seabeyond Nov 2013 #29

Way to ignore the real victim here Orrex Nov 2013 #37

I can think of a couple of things. . . . niyad Nov 2013 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author seabeyond Nov 2013 #41

so sorry. i have done this to you twice. i read only part and do not finish your post before going seabeyond Nov 2013 #42

No harm! Orrex Nov 2013 #44

thank you.... seabeyond Nov 2013 #46

Orrex is cool BainsBane Nov 2013 #49

I just re-read and noticed something else gollygee Nov 2013 #47

Not just predator but the girl was a "sexual predator." BainsBane Nov 2013 #50

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #59

IMO: The judge's ruling is unacceptable. In_The_Wind Nov 2013 #67

This happened in August............ immediately PumpkinAle Nov 2013 #52

Um, what? nt Deep13 Nov 2013 #54

Despicable. n/t cui bono Nov 2013 #55

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #57

A grown-ass man has to be held accountable in a situation like this. dawg Nov 2013 #72