Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge Calls 13-Year-Old Girl Who Was Sexually Assaulted by a 41-Year-Old "Predatory" [View all]BainsBane
(57,751 posts)50. Not just predator but the girl was a "sexual predator."
She looked older than 14. How could a 41 year old man possibly resist her assault on him.
A judge allowed a paedophile to walk free after his 13-year-old victim was described as a 'sexual predator' who was 'egging him on' to engage in a sexual act.
Judge Nigel Peters told Neil Wilson, 41, who pleaded guilty to the abuse, he had also taken account the fact the child looked older.
Wilson lured the teenager to his home in Romford, Essex, where he watched her strip out of her school uniform before she performed a sex act on him.
The abuse did not come to light until the girl confided in a friend who then told police.
Judge Nigel Peters told Neil Wilson, 41, who pleaded guilty to the abuse, he had also taken account the fact the child looked older.
Wilson lured the teenager to his home in Romford, Essex, where he watched her strip out of her school uniform before she performed a sex act on him.
The abuse did not come to light until the girl confided in a friend who then told police.
The judge said in open court:
I have taken in to account that even though the girl was 13, the prosecution say she looked and behaved a little bit older.
You knew she was not nearly 16 as she said and your plea of guilty recognises that you knew.
Allowing her to visit your home is something we have to clamp down on and in normal circumstances that would mean a significant term in prison.
On these facts, the girl was predatory and was egging you on.
You knew she was not nearly 16 as she said and your plea of guilty recognises that you knew.
Allowing her to visit your home is something we have to clamp down on and in normal circumstances that would mean a significant term in prison.
On these facts, the girl was predatory and was egging you on.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2384988/Paedophile-spared-jail-13-year-old-victim-looked-older-sexual-predator-egging-on.html#ixzz2lcKutwkQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Judge Calls 13-Year-Old Girl Who Was Sexually Assaulted by a 41-Year-Old "Predatory" [View all]
RandySF
Nov 2013
OP
Oh, well she looked acted like she was 14 so that makes it all ok? And 41 had no ability to restrain
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#2
Talk about abusing the law, twisting it upside down. The judge needs to be removed from serving,
Jefferson23
Nov 2013
#4
part of the sentence has been reviewd, and the judge is apparently under investigation
niyad
Nov 2013
#6
thank you niyad... that just simply floors me. i would be so fuckin embarrassed that my
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#30
rec'ing because this disgusting crap needs to be widely known. rape culture is alive and well
niyad
Nov 2013
#5
Who knew that that girls and women had such powers? It's aupernatural, that's what it is! Excuse me
freshwest
Nov 2013
#20
this is the "honourable judge nigel peters " (gee, judge, what's in YOUR closet??)
niyad
Nov 2013
#7
point. i guess at this point all the men, the judge, prosecutor and rapist merely see
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#33
Perhaps someone should investigate this judge. Belgium can't have been unique.
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#13
good for you men. i would be so insulted if i was a man reading this shit. damn... nt
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#34
Judges make decisions like this, and meanwhile non-predatory porn is being blocked outright.
TroglodyteScholar
Nov 2013
#16
If you think all acts of human sexuality constitute violence towards women, I can't help you.
TroglodyteScholar
Nov 2013
#53
YOU made the statement it was being blocked. what is being blocked is RAPE porn. wtf are
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#56
I'm sorry, I have yet to see anything indicating that the UK will only block rape related content
TroglodyteScholar
Nov 2013
#65
ah, so you go from one made up accusation to another. where have i said ALL porn is rape. point it
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#66
one post.... one. yes. it is simple. you say whatever garbage as your argument and it fails
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#69
so... another fail... just a made up story thrown out there with no basis. yup. #4 fail
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#71
exactly. wtf would us women be angry. hmmm. lets see. calif, montana, alabama, steubanville
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#36
and this brings up and important point. it is so hard for girls and women to step forward. so many
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#48
omg, men are you not embarassed as fuck that your gender is looked at so pathetically by this male
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#29