General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Liberals and violent porn and rape simulation [View all]Kurska
(5,739 posts)When I repeatedly stressed that I only supported consensual sexual activity being recorded. That is incredibly intellectual dishonest. I bet you've watched a ton of media where women are subjected to violence and even financially contributed to it. The difference being that violence isn't actually real or forced upon them. You take away that last bit of information and you make everything look way worse.
Why don't you just ask me if I still beat my wife. At least be up front with your loaded questions.
I support the right of individuals to engage in and even record whatever consensual sexual activity they want to. I find it disgusting that some people don't think women have a right to film themselves engaging in incredibly rough sex. Women are not precious flowers that need to be protected by anyone elses morality or tastes. They have every right to engage in whatever fetish videos they want to.
Obviously it would be a tremendous crime to force anyone to engage in such activities, but somehow I have a feeling you're going to ignore me saying that and claim I support that. Because that is apparently the only argument the other side of this debate has. You want to censor people's sexual activities and your only argument to do that is to conflate it with things it ain't, because nearly no one on DU thinks it is a good idea to go around banning fiction.
So as a matter of fact, I do not support women being forced into sexual activity on camera against their will. I do support the right of women to engage in any consensual sexual activity they want on film. If you seriously can't understand how those are different positions, than you've become unwilling to even attempt to understand opposing opinions.
I've seen that same kind of question and implication done over and over in this thread and no one has said yes. It has gotten to the point where it isn't even a real question, it seems like people are more interested in discrediting other people by repeatedly asking if they hold a position that no sane member of our society holds. That is barely a step above name calling as far as a debate tactic goes.