Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
13. It's not about not being "done right" at the federal level
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 11:15 AM
Nov 2013

It's that 36 states, with 36 different eligibility requirements and 36 different databases and software systems to tie into, decided not to set up their own exchanges. Integrating them is a nightmare beyond nightmares.

Seattle Times, on why Washington State (or California) isn't having the problems that the federal government is:

Under the Affordable Care Act, states that chose not to create their own exchanges are to use an exchange set up by the federal government — Healthcare.gov. Thirty-six states chose not to create their own exchange.

The federal system must be capable of integrating with multiple-state eligibility databases.

“It’s just the complexity of their scope vs. ours,” said Curt Kwak, chief information officer of the Washington Health Benefit Exchange, the public-private corporation that manages Healthplanfinder. “We focus on just one state, but they are having to focus on 36 states. It’s just that much more complex.”

Robert Booz, an analyst with consulting group Gartner’s health-care-industry research unit, noted that each state has different computer equipment, different software and different bureaucratic structures. Tying them all together, Booz said, “was an incredibly complex, very short-fuse situation.

>

According to Kwak, his team benefited from being able to focus solely on the issues peculiar to Washington state. That meant, of course, building a clean consumer website and preparing for integration with the federal Data Services Hub, a data center managed by CMS that provides one connection to the common federal data sources (including the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service) to verify consumer application information for income, citizenship and immigration status.

But the trickiest part, Kwak said, was integrating the state eligibility system, which tracks services — including Medicaid — that residents are eligible to receive. The state decided to build that leg of the system from scratch.

http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2022149296_acaexchangesxml.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well of course mandatory private insurance is going to make people sign up for private insurance Fumesucker Nov 2013 #1
So what you mean is that people would not have signed up without the mandate, right? JoePhilly Nov 2013 #2
I read that as whether people can get care without going bankrupt HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #3
So let's put the blame on the GOP Governors in those states ... JoePhilly Nov 2013 #7
What's needed is rather more than a blame the politicians game HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #10
Lovely talk. What matters is that the Republican Party does not care whether people JDPriestly Nov 2013 #30
I really do understand the nature of campaigning. HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #31
“Identifying Problem?" busterbrown Nov 2013 #37
Some would and some wouldn't n/t Fumesucker Nov 2013 #5
Under single payer if you don't you go to jail. joshcryer Nov 2013 #12
I have family in Europe I stay in contact with Fumesucker Nov 2013 #34
Many people would not have. Many people never did. Many people won't sign up, even with the merrily Nov 2013 #23
You have a flare for ambiguity. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #25
Most people can understand what I posted. merrily Nov 2013 #27
Yes, that many people did things, or also never did them. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #28
YOU ARE CORRECT Skittles Nov 2013 #36
Then why do polls show that MA residents are very happy with their insurance? n/t pnwmom Nov 2013 #8
Yes, and there MUST be mandates to get everyone in. But most get subsidies. It is a STEP. And, RBInMaine Nov 2013 #14
Ain't it the truth?! Tigress DEM Nov 2013 #4
Of course it can work - TBF Nov 2013 #6
And Canada proves that a country of 35 million can make single-payer work; the UK that a country of pampango Nov 2013 #9
Agreed. Now please tell us how you are going to get the US House to approve that. RBInMaine Nov 2013 #15
I hope that is a rhetorical request. pampango Nov 2013 #21
But if the ACA isn't killed by SCOTUS we'll NEVER get Single Payer! joshcryer Nov 2013 #11
We will not get national single payer anytime soon. End the pipedream and do what is possible. RBInMaine Nov 2013 #16
We'll get it faster than Canada, I bet. joshcryer Nov 2013 #17
15-20? pangaia Nov 2013 #18
That's my cynical estimate. joshcryer Nov 2013 #19
Not quite. polly7 Nov 2013 #26
I was more going by Tommy Douglas' hospital care. joshcryer Nov 2013 #29
Vermont has started single payer. vinny9698 Nov 2013 #33
It's not about not being "done right" at the federal level frazzled Nov 2013 #13
We keep... DirtyDawg Nov 2013 #20
See what happens when you make Republicans irrelevant? Jack Rabbit Nov 2013 #22
Romneycare proved Obamacare CAN work. However, single payer is the goal. merrily Nov 2013 #24
Love Dr. Krugman and his clear eyes. Hekate Nov 2013 #32
Short Term It's Fine colsohlibgal Nov 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman: If Obamacare can...»Reply #13