Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Krugman: If Obamacare can work in a state of 38 million people, it can work in America as a whole [View all]frazzled
(18,402 posts)13. It's not about not being "done right" at the federal level
It's that 36 states, with 36 different eligibility requirements and 36 different databases and software systems to tie into, decided not to set up their own exchanges. Integrating them is a nightmare beyond nightmares.
Seattle Times, on why Washington State (or California) isn't having the problems that the federal government is:
Under the Affordable Care Act, states that chose not to create their own exchanges are to use an exchange set up by the federal government Healthcare.gov. Thirty-six states chose not to create their own exchange.
The federal system must be capable of integrating with multiple-state eligibility databases.
Its just the complexity of their scope vs. ours, said Curt Kwak, chief information officer of the Washington Health Benefit Exchange, the public-private corporation that manages Healthplanfinder. We focus on just one state, but they are having to focus on 36 states. Its just that much more complex.
Robert Booz, an analyst with consulting group Gartners health-care-industry research unit, noted that each state has different computer equipment, different software and different bureaucratic structures. Tying them all together, Booz said, was an incredibly complex, very short-fuse situation.
>
According to Kwak, his team benefited from being able to focus solely on the issues peculiar to Washington state. That meant, of course, building a clean consumer website and preparing for integration with the federal Data Services Hub, a data center managed by CMS that provides one connection to the common federal data sources (including the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service) to verify consumer application information for income, citizenship and immigration status.
But the trickiest part, Kwak said, was integrating the state eligibility system, which tracks services including Medicaid that residents are eligible to receive. The state decided to build that leg of the system from scratch.
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2022149296_acaexchangesxml.html
The federal system must be capable of integrating with multiple-state eligibility databases.
Its just the complexity of their scope vs. ours, said Curt Kwak, chief information officer of the Washington Health Benefit Exchange, the public-private corporation that manages Healthplanfinder. We focus on just one state, but they are having to focus on 36 states. Its just that much more complex.
Robert Booz, an analyst with consulting group Gartners health-care-industry research unit, noted that each state has different computer equipment, different software and different bureaucratic structures. Tying them all together, Booz said, was an incredibly complex, very short-fuse situation.
>
According to Kwak, his team benefited from being able to focus solely on the issues peculiar to Washington state. That meant, of course, building a clean consumer website and preparing for integration with the federal Data Services Hub, a data center managed by CMS that provides one connection to the common federal data sources (including the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service) to verify consumer application information for income, citizenship and immigration status.
But the trickiest part, Kwak said, was integrating the state eligibility system, which tracks services including Medicaid that residents are eligible to receive. The state decided to build that leg of the system from scratch.
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2022149296_acaexchangesxml.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Krugman: If Obamacare can work in a state of 38 million people, it can work in America as a whole [View all]
liberal N proud
Nov 2013
OP
Well of course mandatory private insurance is going to make people sign up for private insurance
Fumesucker
Nov 2013
#1
So what you mean is that people would not have signed up without the mandate, right?
JoePhilly
Nov 2013
#2
Lovely talk. What matters is that the Republican Party does not care whether people
JDPriestly
Nov 2013
#30
Many people would not have. Many people never did. Many people won't sign up, even with the
merrily
Nov 2013
#23
Then why do polls show that MA residents are very happy with their insurance? n/t
pnwmom
Nov 2013
#8
Yes, and there MUST be mandates to get everyone in. But most get subsidies. It is a STEP. And,
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#14
And Canada proves that a country of 35 million can make single-payer work; the UK that a country of
pampango
Nov 2013
#9
Agreed. Now please tell us how you are going to get the US House to approve that.
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#15