Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge Calls 13-Year-Old Girl Who Was Sexually Assaulted by a 41-Year-Old "Predatory" [View all]elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)73. you made up something very stoopid
try to comprehend the post
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Judge Calls 13-Year-Old Girl Who Was Sexually Assaulted by a 41-Year-Old "Predatory" [View all]
RandySF
Nov 2013
OP
Oh, well she looked acted like she was 14 so that makes it all ok? And 41 had no ability to restrain
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#2
Talk about abusing the law, twisting it upside down. The judge needs to be removed from serving,
Jefferson23
Nov 2013
#4
part of the sentence has been reviewd, and the judge is apparently under investigation
niyad
Nov 2013
#6
thank you niyad... that just simply floors me. i would be so fuckin embarrassed that my
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#30
rec'ing because this disgusting crap needs to be widely known. rape culture is alive and well
niyad
Nov 2013
#5
Who knew that that girls and women had such powers? It's aupernatural, that's what it is! Excuse me
freshwest
Nov 2013
#20
this is the "honourable judge nigel peters " (gee, judge, what's in YOUR closet??)
niyad
Nov 2013
#7
point. i guess at this point all the men, the judge, prosecutor and rapist merely see
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#33
Perhaps someone should investigate this judge. Belgium can't have been unique.
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#13
good for you men. i would be so insulted if i was a man reading this shit. damn... nt
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#34
Judges make decisions like this, and meanwhile non-predatory porn is being blocked outright.
TroglodyteScholar
Nov 2013
#16
If you think all acts of human sexuality constitute violence towards women, I can't help you.
TroglodyteScholar
Nov 2013
#53
YOU made the statement it was being blocked. what is being blocked is RAPE porn. wtf are
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#56
I'm sorry, I have yet to see anything indicating that the UK will only block rape related content
TroglodyteScholar
Nov 2013
#65
ah, so you go from one made up accusation to another. where have i said ALL porn is rape. point it
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#66
one post.... one. yes. it is simple. you say whatever garbage as your argument and it fails
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#69
so... another fail... just a made up story thrown out there with no basis. yup. #4 fail
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#71
exactly. wtf would us women be angry. hmmm. lets see. calif, montana, alabama, steubanville
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#36
and this brings up and important point. it is so hard for girls and women to step forward. so many
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#48
omg, men are you not embarassed as fuck that your gender is looked at so pathetically by this male
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#29