Those who demand that everyone "just ACCEPT that Oswald did it"...

[MrMickeysMom]

266. Good observation...

I've basically placed persons through the years posting on this subject into two groups:

1) open to question based on the interest in science of this assassination, and...

2) those with an ideology and less interest to expand knowledge.

We'll never know why persons who argue with the first group are as adamant to dismiss them, insulting group, but lots of them are. They frequented DU-2's "9/11" forum and the left-overs like to do the same when posting to the topic, "creative speculation".

It makes sense to me to question why high government involvement has suppressed information that could even strengthen Oswald's connection as a lone shooter, but the government's reason to hide this information is one of "national security".

Whose security? And, who decides?

Recent to November 22nd, Oswald was in contact with elements of the government who were eager to frame him afterwards. Newspapers printed half way around the world produced background information about Oswald as the lone killer and pages about his motive before he was even booked with the crimes on Nov 22nd. Since then, personal information is suppressed in government archives because of what, exactly?

Why would a single person, a.k.a. "lone nut"'s personal records be so likely to risk national security? The absurdities of what is hidden away all this time, and extended to be kept from the public march on through time, and into perpetuity.

Why?

And for my asking why or anyone else, the second group runs around with their hair on fire. Imagine why that is, also. I don't spend too much time on that part anymore.