This message was self-deleted by its author

[Prophet 451]

294. OK, "sweetie" was patronising

I'll apologise for that one.

1) And rape is a crime, hence the clear implication that this should be banned.
2) An some people like to be debased that way. Again, you are saying that teh only acceptable outlets of sexuality are the ones that *you* are comfortable with.
3) Again, the only acceptable form of sexual expression are forms you're comfortable with.
4) Except that it's really questionable whether there has been any widespread history of coercion. Humans have been producing porn for as long as we've been human, including in societies that treated women much better than we do. Again, there have always been willing participants in porn.
5) a. Again, some people get off on others treating them that way. My SO had a regular caller who got off on being called ethnic slurs (he was Pakistani, IIRC); b. Sick doesn't mean it should be banned. I think the protests of the WBC are sick but the SCOTUS has decided that they're protected by free speech. Nazi porn is sick, I entirely agree, but that doesn't necessarily mean it should be banned.
6) You're making the assumption that, just because I'm arguing against you, I'm outraged by you expressing your opinion. Sorry to interrupt your persecution party but I'm really not. I just don't agree with you.

"Now as far as your belief I've implied a ban by shaming others. If you're ashamed of what you're doing in your sex life that's on you. "

No, that's just shifting goalposts. Your implication was clear, many people picked up on it, you don't get to try flipping it back on me.