Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
6. Well, not completely.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 02:22 AM
Nov 2013

IIRC, Rather touted a document purporting to show that Bush's CO told him to take his physical by a specific date -- an order that was never actually given.

Of course, the important part, without that embellishment, was true -- that Bush had failed to take his physical and was therefore not cleared to fly. If Castro had sent his air force over to attack the Gulf Coast, Bush wouldn't have been able to participate in the defense.

One problem is that Bush's failure to take his physical was known before Rather's story. All Rather added were the embellishments from the documents, which are now generally believed to be false. His report, even had it turned out to be completely true, didn't add very much to what was already known about Bush's dereliction of duty.

That's why I personally believe that Rove had a hand in the whole thing. Rove got the documents out there, hoping that some reporter would get carried away by the hope of landing a scoop, and Rather went for it. The net result, as Rove had hoped, was that people focused on the falsity of Rather's additions to the story and were distracted from the truth of the important parts of the story.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Had a little fun with Pho...»Reply #6