General Discussion

treestar

(82,383 posts)

56. I don't think she really did that, though

Reply to WhaTHellsgoingonhere (Reply #11)

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 07:55 PM

Mar 2012

She was using the concept of people not understanding that there is not a clear line between abortion and contraception that can be conveniently defined as "life begins at conception." They aren't getting that if that were true, some of the BC pill's effects could be seen as terminating a life since there can still be fertilized ovum in the birth control pill context.

That includes pro-life women and excluded pro-choice men. The man cave thing was just a comedic device.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why has no one called out Rachel Maddow for her misandry? [View all] WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 OP

I had to look up "misandristic." Suich Mar 2012 #1

Well, you're wrong. It was misandristic. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #2

Off topic but heres a good addon for firefox madokie Mar 2012 #37

Which one are you talking about? The one from last October? csziggy Mar 2012 #3

No, it was less educational and more patronizing than you wish to admit too. She did it to... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #6

It was more educational than what most men bother to learn about women's reproduction csziggy Mar 2012 #48

She had some fun poking stupidity with a stick. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #4

Maher, misogynistic? Pfft. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #7

Maher occasionally makes sexist remarks, but he's no misogynist. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #10

No, I'm thinking that all of the threads about liberal misogynists are out of control WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #11

If Rachel spent 10 minutes 'humiliating, shaming, and patronizing' (AKA: mocking) AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #12

Is that what you've learned along the way? Stoop to their level? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #13

What a pantload. EFerrari Mar 2012 #15

How is Rachel different than Bill Maher or other liberals who've crawled up your butts? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #18

Lmao. EFerrari Mar 2012 #49

"Some of yous is ridiculous," LOL! pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #22

I know! None of you want to look! The horror!! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #23

"None of you want to look!" pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #25

YES!!! It is about you! It's all about you! If you *tried*, you would have figured that out long ago WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #27

You ought to consider getting back on your meds :) pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #31

I gave you too much credit, then WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #34

+1 sarcasmo Mar 2012 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #16

It's their crap Shankapotomus Mar 2012 #21

If Republican men have any self-awareness (doubtful), then ... tledford Mar 2012 #41

I don't think she really did that, though treestar Mar 2012 #56

She tells it like it is. If you don't like it. Get out of the kitchen. appleannie1 Mar 2012 #5

If you can't follow along, get out of the kitchen. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #9

LOL nicely done. k&r. nt TeamsterDem Mar 2012 #8

You couldn't even get 2 DUers to agree that Sharon Osborne was being sexist Zalatix Mar 2012 #14

You can't follow the discussion because you choose not to try. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #19

You can't follow what I SAID because you choose not to read. Zalatix Mar 2012 #38

I suspect they left that to you, and you're managing quite nicely. MADem Mar 2012 #17

This is low hanging fruit WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #20

Oh, I think it's already fallen off the tree at this point. nt MADem Mar 2012 #39

He is just mad cause no one would poo poo on Maher Rex Mar 2012 #52

I confess! Like *you*, I love it when Rachel demeans Republican men, too!! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #24

Maybe because we are secure in our manhood. Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #26

I don't know what accounts for all the knee-jerking 'round here WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #28

False Equivalency is always problematic Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #29

For many, equating Maher to Limbaugh came very easy WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #33

Because 99% of US population Dokkie Mar 2012 #30

I think everyone is fucking nuts 2pooped2pop Mar 2012 #32

I'm buying WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #35

I agree with you liberal_mama Mar 2012 #42

It's not so bad to own up to it 2pooped2pop Mar 2012 #47

Exactly. pa28 Mar 2012 #53

My shift is about up, and by the time I rise this thread will have been vaporized by Team Maddow WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2012 #36

There is a difference between belittling a perception, and belittling a person. haele Mar 2012 #43

I'm in my "man cave" right now. Actually it's just the computer room, however... HopeHoops Mar 2012 #44

Trolling FAIL. Odin2005 Mar 2012 #45

He tried to poo poo Maher Rex Mar 2012 #51

...you'd have to morally dumb not to see the difference fascisthunter Mar 2012 #46

Wow, people cannot handle Gush being called out Rex Mar 2012 #50

So true Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #58

Wait...what? NoNeed4Attention Mar 2012 #54

Because most men aren't so overly sensitive that they see 'evil intentions' behind every joke. DutchLiberal Mar 2012 #55

This has to be satire. Quantess Mar 2012 #57