Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(90,002 posts)
13. Agreed, but this issue is SO personal. To more than 50% of the planet if I'm not mistaken.
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 08:55 PM
Mar 2012

I'd rather it be other issues too because dammit, this was settled! We've already been through this! WHY are we having to defend it yet again?

But it's more than simply a wedge issue. To women everywhere, it's absolutely vital! It intrudes into only just THE most personal and private and intimate parts of the female human's body. What most of this legislation supports and demands is in many cases a LITERAL assault on one's physical person forcryingoutloud! For me, this is an absolute, flat-out non-negotiable. MY rights, MY right to have the last word on what happens to MY body, is an absolute. To some it's a side issue. To me, I'm afraid everything starts from that. It's the first level of "Sorting Hat" for me. If they're pro-choice, then we proceed. If they're anti-choice, they're automatically eliminated. Yes, unemployment and poverty are priorities. No debate there. Yes, eliminating war and changing course away from our long history of predatory international imperialism and aggression. Yes, if we're talking morals we damn well better walk the walk, and that means moral business practices domestically AND overseas. Major, high-priority issues all! No debate there, either. But for me, it all starts and ends with the candidate's stand on a woman's right to choose. If a woman is not master of her own body forcryingoutloud, how can she possibly be master of her future - for herself and her family if she has one?

At least in this climate, what's being talked about most is how outrageously disgraceful and offensive the republi-CON policy hard-on is, and how - IRRELEVANT how religious they are - we will NOT be dragged back to the 1950s, or as santorum recently mentioned, 1860. Or farther back than even that. They will NOT turn time back. That isn't possible, and not even an option. I am comforted to see what a huge backlash has been created - against the GOP and in support of the positions Democrats have taken on this issue. It's nice to know the whole country hasn't gone frickin pre-Cambrian on us. Just 30 - 40 %, it appears. The majority REMAINS on our side, though, and has been with us for a long time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If republicans are smart, they will lay off the contraception fight. Quantess Mar 2012 #1
They CAN'T!.. That's the beauty of it!. . . . .n/t annabanana Mar 2012 #17
"If the republicans were smart" they might do a lot of sensible things. rhett o rick Mar 2012 #20
"If Republicans are smart?" Yup, and if your aunt had balls, she'd be your uncle. 11 Bravo Mar 2012 #24
We need to take this issue and run with it. Kalidurga Mar 2012 #2
Agreed, but this issue is SO personal. To more than 50% of the planet if I'm not mistaken. calimary Mar 2012 #13
Men who think that women need to listen to *their* wisdom on this issue Quantess Mar 2012 #18
Yeah, but this is worse. It's an unwanted GOVERNMENT reaching into your crotch. calimary Mar 2012 #22
I drove through the heart of Los Angeles and westward this morning, JDPriestly Mar 2012 #3
They're not going to overpopulate! They've got promise rings to keep them.... Moonwalk Mar 2012 #7
But they're not worried. Rapture will carry them to Jesus soon. Quantess Mar 2012 #8
every state in this country has anti-abortion-birth control neanderthals.... madrchsod Mar 2012 #9
The ones in my state are transplants from California!! proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #12
They simply don't care about overpopulation. WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2012 #21
The more states Pope Richardus wins HockeyMom Mar 2012 #4
Good for the Dems Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #5
Well Of Course... WillyT Mar 2012 #6
Make them eat quiche. alfredo Mar 2012 #14
Prospect for front page? longship Mar 2012 #10
What? Democrats Aren't Playing Bi-partisan Patty-cake With The Rethuglies? Vogon_Glory Mar 2012 #11
Give em enough rope... alfredo Mar 2012 #15
If they aren't going to be productive for the rest of the year socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #16
One of the stupidest, most offensive titles I've seen since someone last quoted Limbaugh saras Mar 2012 #19
The pukes decided to run with this issue hifiguy Mar 2012 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Case You Missed This.....»Reply #13