Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
20. Much easier to prove Oswald not alone than that he was
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:09 AM
Nov 2013

If ANY of the following are true then "Oswald acted alone" is false:

- more than 3 shots fired
- shots from more than one direction
- Oswald connected to ANY one of: Ruby, Banister, CIA, Milteer, Lake Pontchartrain, anti-Castro militias, the Mafia(s)

As for ignoring evidence here is a small part of what is ignored or explained away by the theories of the WCR:

- paraffin test on Oswald showed no signs of him firing a weapon that day yet according to WCR he fired 8 rounds from two different weapons
- 39 witness heard shots from the fence, police and sec service went immediately to the area
- witnesses reported 2 men fleeing from the backside of the fence
- Abraham Zapruder testifed under oath twice that the head shot came from behind him and that he felt "they were ganging up" on Kennedy
- John Connally and his wife don't believe that the bullet that went into JFK's neck was the same bullet that hit Connally from the rear.
- Oswald joined the USMC as soon as he could, achieved security clearance, worked with the U2 program, and was trained in Russian by the military before "defecting."
- Oswald was involved with anti-Castro militia in the New Orleans / Lake Pontchartrain area
- phone records obtained by RFK showed that Oswald had called mafia members in the days leading up to the murders
- LBJ did not agree with the conclusions of the WCR

If the evidence was as consistent and clear as we would all like it to be then there would be no controversy at this point but it isn't. Also, Oswald's background and associations should be enough to make it clear that he wasn't alone in anything he did.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicking for the Sunday readers. nt The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #1
Here's the problem RobertEarl Nov 2013 #2
It's got nothing to do with trusting authority. DanTex Nov 2013 #3
Has everything to do with trust RobertEarl Nov 2013 #5
Let's see Bush lied, Reagan lied, and therefore our government lied re JFK. duffyduff Nov 2013 #6
What the Bushes or Reagan or Nixon said has nothing to do with JFK's assassination. DanTex Nov 2013 #8
Wow RobertEarl Nov 2013 #10
As usual, you ignore the part about the actual evidence. DanTex Nov 2013 #11
And your first sentence sums up yours. "Wow." The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #12
Question away. Who is stopping you? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #4
What does "ecumenical" mean to you? RobertEarl Nov 2013 #7
This thread isn't really about me. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #9
Bush was also CIA head RobertEarl Nov 2013 #13
Has jack shit to do with the OP and proves nothing. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #14
Wow, that's fascinating! DanTex Nov 2013 #15
"Conspiracy culture"? IMO, that's a well-fitting shoe. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16
Those are good examples of revealed conspiracies. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #17
Simply because there are those who refuse to accept strong circumstantial evidence does not WinkyDink Nov 2013 #18
Comparing JFK conspiracies to the Simpson murder is truly preposterous. DanTex Nov 2013 #19
Much easier to prove Oswald not alone than that he was KurtNYC Nov 2013 #20
... DanTex Nov 2013 #24
Thanks for a factual post. duffyduff Nov 2013 #26
Your post confirms many of the facts I cite KurtNYC Nov 2013 #28
Huh? What facts would those be? DanTex Nov 2013 #33
B.S. It's a fact he acted alone. duffyduff Nov 2013 #25
What ''conspiracy-relishing coverage of the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination''? Octafish Nov 2013 #21
Yes, Dr. Earle is "coming from" the profession of history. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #22
No, he's ''coming from'' the profession of disinformationist. Octafish Nov 2013 #23
Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. DanTex Nov 2013 #27
Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. Ichingcarpenter Nov 2013 #29
LOL. "your story is full of holes" DanTex Nov 2013 #30
So what? Oswald in Mexico City was no misidentification. Octafish Nov 2013 #32
That's all pure speculation. DanTex Nov 2013 #35
Thanks for knocking down this strawman... MinM Nov 2013 #34
Well, he's a tenured professor at a state university and teaches a course in conspiracy theory. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #37
The two biggest contribution to ongoing conspiracy theories is ... Vox Moi Nov 2013 #31
It is clear you did not read the thread. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The JFK Assassination and...»Reply #20