Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

d_r

(6,908 posts)
24. it makes for an interesting map
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:15 AM
Nov 2013

but beyond that it is silly.
Here's an example. Why not keep Huntsville with Alabama and Chattanooga with Tennessee, rather than flipping them? The population in those areas would be about the same. This shows just one example of how arbitrary these sorts of decisions would be. Now reality. Chattanooga is separated from the rest of "King" by mountains. You'd have to go through Mammoth to get to the rest of the state. It is even worse for the western part of Columbia. No way across those mountains, basically you'd have to go to the city of Atlanta to get back up to the rest of the state. Despite that little tip up through Dalton, Atlanta still wouldn't have access to the Tennessee river (good), but now Columbia, King, and Mammoth have control over Atlanta's current water supply. Good luck with that Atlanta. King is going to keep the Coosa flowing through King into what is now Alabama and North Florida. Speaking of Florida, as if the aquifer wasn't in bad enough shape, now lets let canaveral cyphon it all off before it gets south to tampa bay and miami (and the desert formerly known as the everglades). The current state of Tennessee is now split across five states, who gets what resources? Thanks for breaking up the University system, that will be a nightmare. We will have to revise the prison system, the court system, and school systems. Etc.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Cool. blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #1
Looks like I'll be in Tule sakabatou Nov 2013 #2
What if the population shifts dem in texas Nov 2013 #3
Hmmm.... Redraw the lines every X number of years? Like once a century, or something? nt Electric Monk Nov 2013 #4
Often mass migration follows where the jobs are located. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #13
The problem is that we have a finite "magic number" of 435. SoCalDem Nov 2013 #29
There is no such place as the Alaskan Peninsula. Blue_In_AK Nov 2013 #5
I think the entire thing JackInGreen Nov 2013 #7
That kind of makes sense. Blue_In_AK Nov 2013 #10
You would indeed, and Olympia JackInGreen Nov 2013 #12
Seattle good, Spokane bad.:) Blue_In_AK Nov 2013 #17
Oh, it's not 'Bad' per se JackInGreen Nov 2013 #41
I do like the idea of dividing the country into electoral/congressional districts nyquil_man Nov 2013 #6
Why not just do away with electoral votes altogether? Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #8
Then what's the point of doing the map? nt nyquil_man Nov 2013 #15
Perhaps to have each Senator and each Representative Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #16
Or perhaps the point is "Electoral College Reform," which is the title of the piece. nyquil_man Nov 2013 #34
From the creator of the map: Nine Nov 2013 #25
I'm a map nerd too. nyquil_man Nov 2013 #35
Interesting, but..... DeSwiss Nov 2013 #9
We are here Vox Moi Nov 2013 #28
"Big Thicket" LOL AtheistCrusader Nov 2013 #11
Hey! HEY! don't you go making fun of my Big Thicket! nt Javaman Nov 2013 #22
At least Oregon would merge with Hawaii davidpdx Nov 2013 #14
I dwell in Good Herb diane in sf Nov 2013 #18
That would certainly make the Senate more democratic (small d). Laelth Nov 2013 #19
why are we changing maps? MissMillie Nov 2013 #20
Wouldn't shoving big cities into units that dilute their political influence HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #21
My first thought was that . . . JustAnotherGen Nov 2013 #26
I'd expect the opposite jeff47 Nov 2013 #36
at a national level the south and texas pick up Wyomings diminished representation. HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #39
No, they don't. Texas and the South have fewer people. jeff47 Nov 2013 #40
I like the new names of the states. Brickbat Nov 2013 #23
it makes for an interesting map d_r Nov 2013 #24
Interesting, JimboBillyBubbaBob Nov 2013 #27
Well I see I'm still in Houston - TBF Nov 2013 #30
Rainier? No. Aristus Nov 2013 #31
Minnesota doesn't look much different, oddly enough. MineralMan Nov 2013 #32
Savannah and Charleston in the same state? Never. aikoaiko Nov 2013 #33
Afternoon kick for this little thought experiment. nt Electric Monk Nov 2013 #37
Being in the same state as Portland, Arcata, and Hawaii XemaSab Nov 2013 #38
I've stated before... krispos42 Nov 2013 #42
So this nation has several billion dollars just laying around Skidmore Nov 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if State boundaries ...»Reply #24