Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. The stockholders will feel it. Most of it still carries down to net post-tax income.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:18 AM
Nov 2013

A deduction isn't the same as a credit. As long as the nominal corporate tax rate is less than 100%, paying a fine and deducting it will still leave less money for stockholders.

The way to make it a proper deterrent is to ensure that the initial amount of the fine is large enough. When an amoral corporation is considering doing something shady to increase its profit, it will weigh the prospective profit against the risk of being caught and fined. The larger the anticipated fine, the less likely it is that the corporation will take the action.

An even better deterrent, of course, would be individual criminal liability for corporate officers who cause the company to undertake the misconduct.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Revolving Door Sham: JPMo...»Reply #8