Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
27. Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 11:44 AM
Nov 2013

Nobody "knew" Oswald was impersonated in Mexico City, because he was not impersonated. There was a photograph taken of a man outside the Russian Embassy, which was momentarily and mistakenly identified as Oswald. But there was never any evidence to link that photo to Oswald. The idea that that was Oswald was pure speculation, which turned out to be mistaken.

The "top CIA official" who you claim "knew" of the impersonation was J Edgar Hoover (FBI, not CIA, but in light of the other misinformation, getting this wrong is the least of your sins). J Edgar Hoover claimed that there seemed to be someone impersonating Oswald. This was based on the claim that FBI agents in Dallas had heard a recording of Oswald speaking on the phone, and believed that it was not Oswald's voice. However, the Dallas FBI office confirmed that this information was mistaken, and that they never received a recording, only a transcript. When Hoover was made aware of this, he corrected himself. The head of the Dallas FBI office, as well as the four Dallas FBI agents who had spoken to Oswald and therefore would have been in a position to recognize his voice, all testified to the HSCA that they never heard any such recording. There is no mystery here whatsoever, only a clerical error, but of course in the minds of conspiracy nuts, there are no clerical errors...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicking for the Sunday readers. nt The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #1
Here's the problem RobertEarl Nov 2013 #2
It's got nothing to do with trusting authority. DanTex Nov 2013 #3
Has everything to do with trust RobertEarl Nov 2013 #5
Let's see Bush lied, Reagan lied, and therefore our government lied re JFK. duffyduff Nov 2013 #6
What the Bushes or Reagan or Nixon said has nothing to do with JFK's assassination. DanTex Nov 2013 #8
Wow RobertEarl Nov 2013 #10
As usual, you ignore the part about the actual evidence. DanTex Nov 2013 #11
And your first sentence sums up yours. "Wow." The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #12
Question away. Who is stopping you? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #4
What does "ecumenical" mean to you? RobertEarl Nov 2013 #7
This thread isn't really about me. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #9
Bush was also CIA head RobertEarl Nov 2013 #13
Has jack shit to do with the OP and proves nothing. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #14
Wow, that's fascinating! DanTex Nov 2013 #15
"Conspiracy culture"? IMO, that's a well-fitting shoe. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16
Those are good examples of revealed conspiracies. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #17
Simply because there are those who refuse to accept strong circumstantial evidence does not WinkyDink Nov 2013 #18
Comparing JFK conspiracies to the Simpson murder is truly preposterous. DanTex Nov 2013 #19
Much easier to prove Oswald not alone than that he was KurtNYC Nov 2013 #20
... DanTex Nov 2013 #24
Thanks for a factual post. duffyduff Nov 2013 #26
Your post confirms many of the facts I cite KurtNYC Nov 2013 #28
Huh? What facts would those be? DanTex Nov 2013 #33
B.S. It's a fact he acted alone. duffyduff Nov 2013 #25
What ''conspiracy-relishing coverage of the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination''? Octafish Nov 2013 #21
Yes, Dr. Earle is "coming from" the profession of history. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #22
No, he's ''coming from'' the profession of disinformationist. Octafish Nov 2013 #23
Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. DanTex Nov 2013 #27
Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. Ichingcarpenter Nov 2013 #29
LOL. "your story is full of holes" DanTex Nov 2013 #30
So what? Oswald in Mexico City was no misidentification. Octafish Nov 2013 #32
That's all pure speculation. DanTex Nov 2013 #35
Thanks for knocking down this strawman... MinM Nov 2013 #34
Well, he's a tenured professor at a state university and teaches a course in conspiracy theory. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #37
The two biggest contribution to ongoing conspiracy theories is ... Vox Moi Nov 2013 #31
It is clear you did not read the thread. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The JFK Assassination and...»Reply #27