Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
33. Huh? What facts would those be?
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:22 PM
Nov 2013

The fact is that you continually ignore the entire record of forensic evidence. I have refuted every single one of your points, while you haven't even attempted to address the actual evidence. Yes, some people reported hearing sounds from the grassy knoll. So what? That proves nothing. Like I said, we know for an absolute fact that no shots from the grassy knoll actually hit JFK, no bullets were found, no shell casings, no shooters, nothing. If there was a shooter, he missed and left no trace of evidence of any kind.

Evidence that you have ignored:

-- There are no entrance wounds on the front of JFK, but two entrance wounds in the back.
-- Both bullets that hit JFK were found, and matched by ballistics to Oswald's gun
-- Three shell casings were found on ths 6'th floor of TSBD
-- Oswald's fingerprints were at the scene of the crime
-- Oswald was last seen on the 6th floor of the TSBD, when Charlie Givens asked him if he was going down to lunch and Oswald said no.
-- One eyewitness saw Oswald actually shooting, immediately reported an accurate description to the police, picked Oswald out of a lineup, and gave sworn testimony to the WC oath that Oswald was the man he saw.
-- Three men positioned immediately below Oswald testified that shots came from right above them, and one of them heard shell casings drop and reloading sounds
-- One of those three men had dust fall on his head from the ceiling due to the gun blast the floor above
-- Oswald fled the scene, and was the only TSBD employee to do so
-- Oswald shot a police officer
-- Oswald left his wedding ring and some money for his wife that morning, something he had never done before
-- Oswald went home to his wife Thursday night, something he had never done before on weekdays
-- Oswald carried a rifle-sized bag to work that day, and when asked about it he said it was curtain rods for his apartment, even though his apartment already had curtain rods
-- Oswald lied to the police claiming that he was at lunch during the shooting, but nobody saw him there, including the people he said were in the room with him
-- Nobody in the TSBD saw Oswald for a period of 30 minutes prior to the shooting.
-- No TSBD employees saw anyone who didn't work there in the building
-- The overwhelming majority of people in Dealey Plaza said they heard three shots
-- More people heard shots from the TSBD than the grassy knoll

Now, just for a second, compare the overwhelming strength of the case against Oswald, against the fact that some witnesses claimed to hear shots from the grassy knoll, the fact that Oswald had an odd life story, and the fact that JFK had a lot of enemies, which in the end are the only actual pieces of evidence to suggest a conspiracy. It's not even close.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicking for the Sunday readers. nt The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #1
Here's the problem RobertEarl Nov 2013 #2
It's got nothing to do with trusting authority. DanTex Nov 2013 #3
Has everything to do with trust RobertEarl Nov 2013 #5
Let's see Bush lied, Reagan lied, and therefore our government lied re JFK. duffyduff Nov 2013 #6
What the Bushes or Reagan or Nixon said has nothing to do with JFK's assassination. DanTex Nov 2013 #8
Wow RobertEarl Nov 2013 #10
As usual, you ignore the part about the actual evidence. DanTex Nov 2013 #11
And your first sentence sums up yours. "Wow." The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #12
Question away. Who is stopping you? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #4
What does "ecumenical" mean to you? RobertEarl Nov 2013 #7
This thread isn't really about me. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #9
Bush was also CIA head RobertEarl Nov 2013 #13
Has jack shit to do with the OP and proves nothing. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #14
Wow, that's fascinating! DanTex Nov 2013 #15
"Conspiracy culture"? IMO, that's a well-fitting shoe. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16
Those are good examples of revealed conspiracies. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #17
Simply because there are those who refuse to accept strong circumstantial evidence does not WinkyDink Nov 2013 #18
Comparing JFK conspiracies to the Simpson murder is truly preposterous. DanTex Nov 2013 #19
Much easier to prove Oswald not alone than that he was KurtNYC Nov 2013 #20
... DanTex Nov 2013 #24
Thanks for a factual post. duffyduff Nov 2013 #26
Your post confirms many of the facts I cite KurtNYC Nov 2013 #28
Huh? What facts would those be? DanTex Nov 2013 #33
B.S. It's a fact he acted alone. duffyduff Nov 2013 #25
What ''conspiracy-relishing coverage of the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination''? Octafish Nov 2013 #21
Yes, Dr. Earle is "coming from" the profession of history. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #22
No, he's ''coming from'' the profession of disinformationist. Octafish Nov 2013 #23
Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. DanTex Nov 2013 #27
Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. Ichingcarpenter Nov 2013 #29
LOL. "your story is full of holes" DanTex Nov 2013 #30
So what? Oswald in Mexico City was no misidentification. Octafish Nov 2013 #32
That's all pure speculation. DanTex Nov 2013 #35
Thanks for knocking down this strawman... MinM Nov 2013 #34
Well, he's a tenured professor at a state university and teaches a course in conspiracy theory. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #37
The two biggest contribution to ongoing conspiracy theories is ... Vox Moi Nov 2013 #31
It is clear you did not read the thread. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The JFK Assassination and...»Reply #33