Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: ACA question.. [View all]
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. I'd research the two drugs and appeal if there is a compelling reason to use the more expensive one.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:10 PM
Nov 2013

Last edited Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:58 PM - Edit history (1)


One of the problems with our health care system is that there are very expensive drugs which do little more than much cheaper, older drugs. For example, some older drugs you have to taken twice a day. A drug manufacturer then produces basically the same drug that is time-released such that only one is needed, but it costs 5 times the older drug.

Pharmaceutical companies pay pretty people to meet with doctors and push their more expensive drugs. Sometimes the detail reps provide good info, sometimes they are just inflating the cost of health care.

As patients we can do our part to help control health care costs. One good thing under ACA is the insurance companies no longer get to pocket all savings under the Medical Loss Ratio provisions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ACA question..»Reply #6