General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Salon: "the Warren Commission... was stacked with RFK’s political enemies" [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)Allen Dulles has nothing to do with it. The bullets that killed JFK were ballistically matched to Oswald's gun. What does that have to do with Dulles? Three employees in the TSBD were watching JFK one floor down, and they heard three rifle shots, along with the sound of a rifle reloading right above them. What does that have to do with Dulles? JFK had two entrance wounds in the back, none in the front, as confirmed not just by the autopsy, but by fifteen other pathologists who reviewed the evidence in multiple subsequent investigations. What does that have to do with Dulles?
And so on.
Accusing me of anger and rage doesn't help your case. What would help your case would be a shred of evidence of a conspiracy, or any reason to doubt the mountain of evidence that points to Oswald alone. The reason you resort to ad hominem is because you can't come up with any of that. No CTer has, despite decades of trying.
Yes, I believe that JFK, RFK, and MLK were shot by lone nuts. Why? Because that is what the evidence shows. I also believe that Ronald Reagan was shot by a lone nut. I believe that the world trade center was taken down by planes, not by explosives. I believe the government when it tells me that Obama was born in Hawaii. I believe that Sandy Hook shootings were actually the work of a deranged lone gunman, rather than some false flag operation by gun control activists.
Again, if there were evidence for a JFK conspiracy, I would happily accept it. I would actually prefer that. My favorite movie genre is espionage thriller, so if it were up to me, JFK would have been shot by a team of Jason Bourne superspies. But that's not what happened.